These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Clinical comparison of the ProTon and Tono-Pen tonometers with the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Midelfart A; Wigers A Br J Ophthalmol; 1994 Dec; 78(12):895-8. PubMed ID: 7819170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Goldmann applanation tonometry in the conscious rat. Cohan BE; Bohr DF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):340-2. PubMed ID: 11157864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs. Görig C; Coenen RT; Stades FC; Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC; Boevé MH Am J Vet Res; 2006 Jan; 67(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 16426223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of three applanation tonometers in dogs. Priehs DR; Gum GG; Whitley RD; Moore LE Am J Vet Res; 1990 Oct; 51(10):1547-50. PubMed ID: 2240775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Measurement of intraocular pressure using the Tono-Pen in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study in 100 eyes]. Deuter CM; Schlote T; Hahn GA; Bende T; Derse M Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Mar; 219(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 11987041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry. Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Proview phosphene tonometer fails to measure ocular pressure accurately in clinical practice. Alvarez TL; Gollance SA; Thomas GA; Greene RJ; Marchetto PM; Moore EJ; Realini T; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Lama P; Fechtner RD Ophthalmology; 2004 Jun; 111(6):1077-85. PubMed ID: 15177956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Perkin's applanation tonometer and the normal range of intraocular pressure in anesthetized rats. Kurata K; Nishida E; Tsukuda R; Suzuki T; Sato S J Toxicol Sci; 1996 Nov; 21(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 8959649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of corneal parameters in keratoconus on IOP readings obtained with different tonometers. Firat PG; Orman G; Doganay S; Demirel S Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Mar; 96(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 23320621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of intraocular pressure in awake mice. Cohan BE; Bohr DF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Oct; 42(11):2560-2. PubMed ID: 11581198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer (Tonovet) in clinically normal cat eyes. Rusanen E; Florin M; Hässig M; Spiess BM Vet Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20149173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of I Care rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after Descemet's stripping with automated endothelium keratoplasty]. Li BZ; Hong J; Peng RM; Wang X; Ren J; Wu LL Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 49(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23866708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients. Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The evaluation of tonometry and self-tonometry with Ocuton tonometers. Kóthy P; Nagymihály A; Holló G Med Sci Monit; 2003 Jan; 9(1):PI1-4. PubMed ID: 12552251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]