These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6767983)

  • 41. Randomized clinical trial comparing consultant-led or open access investigation for large bowel symptoms.
    MacKenzie S; Norrie J; Vella M; Drummond I; Walker A; Molloy R; Galloway DJ; O'Dwyer PJ
    Br J Surg; 2003 Aug; 90(8):941-7. PubMed ID: 12905545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. NSPRC reacts against proposed program of second opinions for elective surgery.
    Welch L
    Hospitals; 1978 Mar; 52(6):40, 42. PubMed ID: 564864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Emergency and elective surgery in patients over age 70.
    Keller SM; Markovitz LJ; Wilder JR; Aufses AH
    Am Surg; 1987 Nov; 53(11):636-40. PubMed ID: 3688659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
    Piver MS
    Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Second opinion program reduces surgical procedures, produces no net savings.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Dec; 32(6):53-4. PubMed ID: 10316529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Motives for seeking a second opinion in orthopaedic surgery.
    van Dalen I; Groothoff J; Stewart R; Spreeuwenberg P; Groenewegen P; van Horn J
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2001 Oct; 6(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 11685782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Primary care case management for Medicaid recipients: evaluation of the Maryland Access to Care program.
    Schoenman JA; Evans WN; Schur CL
    Inquiry; 1997; 34(2):155-70. PubMed ID: 9256820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Second surgical opinion programs: evaluation deficiencies.
    Dunham MH; Hunt VB
    Wis Med J; 1984 Apr; 83(4):23-4. PubMed ID: 6428066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Second opinion plans seen saving money.
    Piontek S
    Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1981 Feb; 85(8):1, 20-1. PubMed ID: 10317067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mandatory second opinion programs.
    Parks P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1983 Oct; 68(10):25. PubMed ID: 10317375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Training in surgical outpatients.
    Raine C; Crofts TJ; Griffiths JM; Aitken RJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1996 Mar; 78(2 Suppl):59-61. PubMed ID: 8687068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The impact of disease management on outcomes and cost of care: a study of low-income asthma patients.
    Rossiter LF; Whitehurst-Cook MY; Small RE; Shasky C; Bovbjerg VE; Penberthy L; Okasha A; Green J; Ibrahim IA; Yang S; Lee K
    Inquiry; 2000; 37(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 10985112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A second look at second surgical opinions.
    Rosenberg SN; Perlis H; Lynne D; Leto L
    Bus Health; 1991 Feb; 9(2):14-6, 19, 22 passim. PubMed ID: 10170695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Second surgical opinion programs: dead or alive?
    McSherry CK; Chen PJ; Worner TM; Kupferstein N; McCarthy EG
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Nov; 185(5):451-6. PubMed ID: 9358088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An analysis of nonconfirmation rates. Experiences of a surgical second opinion program.
    Paris M; Salsberg E; Berenson L
    JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(22):2424-7. PubMed ID: 490854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Patients' reactions and physician-patient communication in a mandatory surgical second-opinion program.
    Rosenberg SN; Gorman SA; Snitzer S; Herbst EV; Lynne D
    Med Care; 1989 May; 27(5):466-77. PubMed ID: 2725081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluating a voluntary second surgical opinion program.
    Joffe J
    Eval Health Prof; 1980 Dec; 3(4):421-33. PubMed ID: 10317038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Second consultant opinion for elective orthopedic surgery.
    McCarthy EG; Finkel ML
    Am J Public Health; 1981 Nov; 71(11):1233-6. PubMed ID: 7294266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Second opinion opportunity declined: patient typology and experiences regarding the decision-making process preceding elective surgeries in Germany.
    May S; Bruch D; Muehlensiepen F; Prediger B; Pieper D; Ronckers C; von Peter S; Neugebauer E
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Nov; 22(1):1329. PubMed ID: 36348323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The evaluation and monitoring of a Medicaid second surgical opinion program.
    Tyson TJ
    Eval Program Plann; 1985; 8(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 10317749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.