These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Comparison of simulator-CT versus simulator fluoroscopy versus surface marking based radiation treatment planning: a prospective study by three-dimensional evaluation. Suhag V; Kaushal V; Yadav R; Das BP Radiother Oncol; 2006 Jan; 78(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 16165239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system. Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surface extraction from multi-material components for metrology using dual energy CT. Heinzl C; Kastner J; Gröller E IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2007; 13(6):1520-7. PubMed ID: 17968105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Presentation of a special cancer radiotherapy volume on the latest developments and clinical applications of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and adaptive radiotherapy (ART)]. Lefkopoulos D; Mazeron JJ Cancer Radiother; 2006 Sep; 10(5):219-21. PubMed ID: 16931092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A computed tomography-based protocol vs conventional clinical mark-up for breast electron boost. Bates AT; Swift CL; Kwa W; Moravan V; Aquino-Parsons C Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2007 Jun; 19(5):349-55. PubMed ID: 17379487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recent development of the Stuttgart program system for treatment planning in neutron therapy. Hehn G; Pfister G; Friedlein HP; Kicherer G Strahlentherapie Sonderb; 1981; 77():72-82. PubMed ID: 6821006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Simulator verification of the accuracy of patient repositioning after virtual simulation. Is physical simulation still needed? Schüller P; Bruns F; Hesselmann S; Horn K; Panke JE; Schuck A; Schäfer U; Micke O; Willich N Strahlenther Onkol; 2002 Dec; 178(12):715-21. PubMed ID: 12491060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors. Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment planning system for fast neutron therapy at NIRS Hospital. Tsunemoto H; Murakami Y; Nakamura Y; Endo S; Maruyama T Strahlentherapie Sonderb; 1981; 77():208-13. PubMed ID: 6820999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement of image quality in megavoltage computed tomography with second generation scanning mode. Nakagawa K; Aoki Y; Sasaki Y Radiat Oncol Investig; 1997; 5(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 9372549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Computed tomography option on simulator: a 14-month use at the Orléans hospital radiotherapy department]. Bouscayrol H; Lescrainier J; Sabattier R; Wachter T; Breteau N Cancer Radiother; 1997; 1(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 9587390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An analog patient model derived from computed tomograms for three-dimensional radiotherapy planning. Tatcher M; Elgrabli S; Kuten A; Kleinhaus U Radiology; 1980 Jul; 136(1):236-8. PubMed ID: 7384510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]