These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6770647)

  • 1. Dilute barium as a contrast agent for abdominal CT.
    Megibow AJ; Bosniak MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Jun; 134(6):1273-4. PubMed ID: 6770647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Picture quality, tolerance, acceptance and longevity of a barium sulfate suspension (Micropaque CT) as an oral intestinal contrast medium for abdominal computed tomography].
    Müller RD; Buddenbrock B
    Rontgenpraxis; 1992 Oct; 45(10):349-55. PubMed ID: 1440063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical efficacy of a new barium sulfate for abdominal CT].
    Yamada T; Kohno M; Uematsu S; Nisitani H; Tanaka T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Nov; 48(11):1381-90. PubMed ID: 3070477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fat-density oral contrast agent for abdominal CT.
    Raptopoulos V; Davis MA; Davidoff A; Karellas A; Hays D; D'Orsi CJ; Smith EH
    Radiology; 1987 Sep; 164(3):653-6. PubMed ID: 3615862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of dilute barium and dilute water-soluble contrast in opacification of the bowel for abdominal computed tomography.
    Chambers SE; Best JJ
    Clin Radiol; 1984 Nov; 35(6):463-4. PubMed ID: 6499385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Hypodense oral intestinal contrasting for the diagnostic optimization of abdominal computed tomograms in children].
    Grützner G; Koch JA; Jungblut RM; Mödder U
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Jan; 4(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8136389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of 2 positive and 1 negative oral contrast media for abdominal CT diagnosis].
    Zwaan M; Gmelin E
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 May; 42(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 2756307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Imaging diagnosis in the study of abnormal abdominal masses].
    Belvedere M; Scardavi M; Peralta S; Pisciotta G; Rini GB
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1987 Mar; 63(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 3307837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Barium sulfate for abdominal computer assisted tomography.
    Hatfield KD; Segal SD; Tait K
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Aug; 4(4):570. PubMed ID: 7391310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abdominal helical CT: milk as a low-attenuation oral contrast agent.
    Thompson SE; Raptopoulos V; Sheiman RL; McNicholas MM; Prassopoulos P
    Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):870-5. PubMed ID: 10352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A new contrast medium for bowel opacification in abdominal CT scans--with comparative studies on water-soluble iodinated contrast and on fat emulsion].
    Sako M; Hasegawa M; Watanabe H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Jan; 44(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 6739282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-absorbable fat-dense oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography.
    Zwaan M; Gmelin E; Borgis KJ; Rinast E
    Eur J Radiol; 1992; 14(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 1563426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Diluted barium contrast agent for digestive opacification in abdominal x-ray computed tomography].
    Boudghene F; Deslandes P; Molinier B; Bigot JM
    J Radiol; 1991; 72(8-9):425-8. PubMed ID: 1920260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re: depiction of normal gastrointestinal anatomy with MDCT: comparison of low- and high-attenuation oral contrast media.
    Kennish SJ; Tolan DJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):551; author reply 551. PubMed ID: 18684579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
    Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
    Koo CW; Shah-Patel LR; Baer JW; Frager DH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. E-Z-CAT. An oral contrast medium for use in computed tomography of the abdomen.
    Nyman U; Dinnetz G; Andersson I
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 6731015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unusual cause of abdominal pain: Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.
    Cortés C; Saénz R; Silva C
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Oct; 5(10):A24. PubMed ID: 17916533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [[Direct coronal mode in CT, of the thorax and abdomen (author's transl)].
    Kaiser MC; Veiga-Pires JA
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1981; 24(6):521-4. PubMed ID: 7294692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of "Gastromiro" for bowel opacification during computed tomography: comparison with diatrizoate and barium sulphate.
    Doyle GJ; O'Donnell SC; McDonald JR; Murthy LN; Keir MJ; Wright AR
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):681-4. PubMed ID: 7719680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.