These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 677128)
1. A robust method for the detection of linkage in familial disease. Fishman PM; Suarez B; Hodge SE; Reich T Am J Hum Genet; 1978 May; 30(3):308-21. PubMed ID: 677128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A complete enumeration and classification of two-locus disease models. Li W; Reich J Hum Hered; 2000; 50(6):334-49. PubMed ID: 10899752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage. Suarez BK; Rice J; Reich T Ann Hum Genet; 1978 Jul; 42(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 686687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses. Thomson G; Motro U Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases. Abreu PC; Greenberg DA; Hodge SE Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Sep; 65(3):847-57. PubMed ID: 10441591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tests of linkage and heterogeneity in Mendelian diseases using identity by descent scores. Chakravarti A; Badner JA; Li CC Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(4):255-66. PubMed ID: 3666434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An exact linkage test for multiple case families. Morton NE Hum Hered; 1983; 33(4):244-9. PubMed ID: 6885087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On a test of non-random segregation under linkage for autosomal recessive diseases. Pal N; Majumder PP Stat Med; 1990 May; 9(5):573-82. PubMed ID: 2349406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between the sibling recurrence-risk ratio and genotype relative risk. Rybicki BA; Elston RC Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):593-604. PubMed ID: 10677319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Some epistatic two-locus models of disease. I. Relative risks and identity-by-descent distributions in affected sib pairs. Hodge SE Am J Hum Genet; 1981 May; 33(3):381-95. PubMed ID: 6941695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using a dummy quantitative variable to deal with multiple affection categories in genetic linkage analysis. Curtis D; Gurling HM Ann Hum Genet; 1991 Oct; 55(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 1819232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strategies and sample-size considerations for mapping a two-locus autosomal recessive disorder. Majumder PP Am J Hum Genet; 1989 Sep; 45(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 2773934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility and efficiency of linked marker genes for genetic counseling. II. Identification of linkage phase by offspring phenotypes. Chakravarti A; Nei M Am J Hum Genet; 1982 Jul; 34(4):531-51. PubMed ID: 6954847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 1: Optimality criteria for affected sib-pair tests. Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP Hum Hered; 1994; 44(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8163290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On effects of relaxed selection in familial disorders. Davie AM; Smith C; Curnow RN; Holloway SM Ann Hum Genet; 1978 May; 41(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 655638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linkage detection adaptive to linkage disequilibrium: the disequilibrium maximum-likelihood-binomial test for affected-sibship data. Huang J; Jiang Y Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Dec; 65(6):1741-59. PubMed ID: 10577929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-locus models of disease: comparison of likelihood and nonparametric linkage methods. Goldin LR; Weeks DE Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Oct; 53(4):908-15. PubMed ID: 8213819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. HLA-associated diseases: a new method for performing linkage analysis with other markers than HLA. Clerget-Darpoux F; Babron MC; Bonaïti-Pellie C Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Sep; 36(5):1075-81. PubMed ID: 6594041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility and efficiency of linked marker genes for genetic counseling. III. Proportion of informative families under linkage disequilibrium. Chakravarti A Am J Hum Genet; 1983 Jul; 35(4):592-610. PubMed ID: 6576632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]