These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effective breast cancer detection with film-screen mammography. Schmitt EL; Threatt BA J Can Assoc Radiol; 1985 Dec; 36(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 4086500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography. Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single view negative mode xeromammography: an approach to reduce radiation exposure in breast cancer screening. Buchanan JB; Jager RM Radiology; 1977 Apr; 123(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 847175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose. Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survey of mammography practices. Bassett LW; Diamond JJ; Gold RH; McLelland R AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1149-52. PubMed ID: 3318338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. One-view follow-up mammogram. Efficacy in screening for breast cancer. Cukier DS; Lopez FA; Maravilla RB JAMA; 1977 Feb; 237(7):661-2. PubMed ID: 576297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [ROC-analysis in x-ray study of the breast; a comparative study between film and xeromammography]. John V; Callies R; Hirche H; Parson C; Tonge K; Lenz W Onkologie; 1979 Oct; 2(5):193-8. PubMed ID: 395475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screen-film mammography versus xeromammography in the detection of breast cancer. Cuttino JT; Yankaskas BC; Hoskins EO Br J Radiol; 1986 Dec; 59(708):1159-62. PubMed ID: 3801794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display. Smathers RL; Bush E; Drace J; Stevens M; Sommer FG; Brown BW; Karras B Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 3704149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic needle localization of lesions seen in only one view. Yagan R; Wiesen E; Bellon EM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 May; 144(5):911-6. PubMed ID: 3872576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contact spot xeromammography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. Buchanan JB; Jager RM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jun; 130(6):1159-62. PubMed ID: 418658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques. Haus AG; Paulus DD; Dodd GD; Cowart RW; Bencomo J Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of breast cancer in an incident cancer population. Schmitt EL; Threatt B AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Aug; 143(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 6611076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic value of xero-mammography in clinically occult breast carcinoma. Kambouris T; Kotoulas K; Pontifex G Radiologe; 1984 May; 24(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 6087403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumor location and detectability in mammographic screening. Schmitt EL; Threatt B AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Oct; 139(4):761-5. PubMed ID: 6981939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems. Sickles EA Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Xeromammography versus screen-film mammography--pros and cons of the two techniques. Sickles EA West J Med; 1981 Mar; 134(3):273-4. PubMed ID: 7269562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]