These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6772681)

  • 1. Physical factors influencing numerical echo-amplitude data extracted from B-scan ultrasound images.
    Jaffe CC; Harris DJ
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1980 Aug; 8(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 6772681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasonic B-scan imaging: theory of image formation and a technique for restoration.
    Fatemi M; Kak AC
    Ultrason Imaging; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 7189615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sonographic tissue texture: influence of transducer focusing pattern.
    Jaffe CC; Harris DJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Aug; 135(2):343-7. PubMed ID: 6773340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer simulations of speckle in B-scan images.
    Foster DR; Arditi M; Foster FS; Patterson MS; Hunt JW
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Oct; 5(4):308-30. PubMed ID: 6686898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visualization of B-scan transducer transverse cross-sectional beam patterns.
    Goldstein A; Parks JA; Osborne B
    J Ultrasound Med; 1982; 1(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 6152921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transducer beam pattern test object.
    Hefner LV; Parks JA; Goldstein A
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1980 Feb; 8(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 6766478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical ultrasonic imaging.
    Schuy S
    Med Prog Technol; 1982; 9(2-3):161-4. PubMed ID: 7162486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microprocessor-base system for ultrasonic tissue characterization.
    Bhagat PK; Kadaba MP; Gupta VN; Wu V
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(4):220-4. PubMed ID: 7412654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and acoustic characterization of limited diffraction ultrasonic devices.
    Aulet A; Núñez I; Moreno E; Eiras JA; Negreira CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):2737-40. PubMed ID: 21117721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attenuation and backscatter estimation using video signal analysis applied to B-mode images.
    Knipp BS; Zagzebski JA; Wilson TA; Dong F; Madsen EL
    Ultrason Imaging; 1997 Jul; 19(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 9447670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Addition of digital scan converters to commercial B-scanners.
    Goldstein A
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1979 Jun; 7(3):178. PubMed ID: 110836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital ultrasonic imaging with microprocessor manipulation.
    Ostro PT; Harrison L
    J Med Eng Technol; 1978 Sep; 2(5):234-8. PubMed ID: 712799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glass-windowed ultrasound transducers.
    Yddal T; Gilja OH; Cochran S; Postema M; Kotopoulis S
    Ultrasonics; 2016 May; 68():108-19. PubMed ID: 26938326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling and computer simulation of ultrasound imaging systems and human tissues.
    Lee BS; Park SB
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Oct; 10(4):229-47. PubMed ID: 3074548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A digital interface for ultrasound tissue characterization study.
    Botros N; Chu WK; Anderson JC; Dobry CA; Imray TJ
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1984; 20():149-55. PubMed ID: 6713054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the AIUM/NEMA, IEC and FDA (1980) definitions of various acoustic output parameters for ultrasonic transducers.
    Livett AJ; Preston RC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1985; 11(6):793-802. PubMed ID: 4095794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advances in instrument design and image recording.
    James AE; Goddard J; Price RR; Jones T; Powis RL
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1980 Apr; 18(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 7367611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two methods for determining ultrasonic intensity for medical transducers.
    Shombert DG; Robinson RA
    Ultrasonics; 1983 Sep; 21(5):234-6. PubMed ID: 6612895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distortion-free delta-sigma beamforming.
    Nilsen CI; Holm S
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Aug; 55(8):1719-28. PubMed ID: 18986916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 120-MHz ultrasound probe for tissue imaging.
    Yokosawa K; Shinomura R; Sano S; Ito Y; Ishikawa S; Sato Y
    Ultrason Imaging; 1996 Oct; 18(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 9101645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.