90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6773280)
1. The attack on the annual 'Pap smear'.
Koss LG
Acta Cytol; 1980; 24(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 6773280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pap tests every three years: cost-effective in the long run?
Amschler DH
Health Educ; 1983; 14(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 6443895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Willingness to pay for new Papanicolaou test technologies.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Hart AR; Kiely S; Andrew-JaJa C; Scioscia E
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Apr; 117(4):524-33. PubMed ID: 11939725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cervical cancer screening and associated treatment costs in France].
Bergeron C; Breugelmans JG; Bouée S; Lorans C; Bénard S; Rémy V
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1036-42. PubMed ID: 17070085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond the Pap. What you should know about a new gene test that could someday replace the Pap smear.
Gorman C
Time; 2000 Jan; 155(2):101. PubMed ID: 10787477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the increased sensitivity of the new Papanicolaou (Pap) tests improve the cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer?
Reust CE
J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):175. PubMed ID: 11219567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical inquiries. Should we discontinue Pap smear screening in women aged>65 years?
Curran DR; Stigleman S; Neher JO
J Fam Pract; 2004 Apr; 53(4):308-10. PubMed ID: 15068776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeat Pap smear at the time of initial colposcopy--another view.
Korman J
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Jun; 69(3):269-70. PubMed ID: 9648601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for cervical cancer: 1982--an update.
Creasman WT; Fowler WC; Homesley HD
N C Med J; 1982 Nov; 43(11):771-3. PubMed ID: 6817144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The cost-effectiveness of three new technologies to enhance Pap testing.
Tecnologica MAP Suppl; 1998 Feb; ():40-1. PubMed ID: 10183360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The thousand-dollar Pap smear.
Bettigole C
N Engl J Med; 2013 Oct; 369(16):1486-7. PubMed ID: 24131176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Pap smear, an "endangered" species.
Spires SE
J Ky Med Assoc; 1997 Apr; 95(4):155-6. PubMed ID: 9110540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Advances in cervical screening technology.
Stoler MH
Mod Pathol; 2000 Mar; 13(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 10757338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The Thin Prep Pap Test; a platform for gynecologic diagnosis].
Scimia M
Pathologica; 2002 Feb; 94(1):63-4. PubMed ID: 11912883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The danger of only using a Pap smear.
Vazquez E
Posit Aware; 1999; 10(3):23. PubMed ID: 11366762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cervix cancer screening can be cost-effective. Combination of vaginal smears and the HPV test should be even more beneficial].
Bistoletti P; Ellström A; Dillner J; Sennfält K; Sparén P; Strander B
Lakartidningen; 2005 Jun 13-26; 102(24-25):1874-6, 1878-9. PubMed ID: 16044766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic impact of automated primary screening for cervical cancer.
Lonky SA
J Reprod Med; 2000 Jan; 45(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 10702051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cancer screening with pattern of pap smear. Review of multicenter studies.
Altaf FJ
Saudi Med J; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1498-502. PubMed ID: 17013471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Annual cervical Pap smear.
Unger JB
Wis Med J; 1986 Aug; 85(8):8-10. PubMed ID: 3788199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
