These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 67738)

  • 1. Histochemical methods for proteins in tissues submitted to decalcification. A histophotometric study.
    Corrêa AC; Blumen G
    Acta Histochem; 1977; 58(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 67738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of decalcification on immunoperoxidase staining.
    Mukai K; Yoshimura S; Anzai M
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1986 Jun; 10(6):413-9. PubMed ID: 2424325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of different combinations of fixatives and decalcifying agents on rat and rabbit hard tissues, a guide for histologic processing.
    Alaeddini M; Bashizadehfakhar H; Amirinia F; Abbasi S; Shamshiri AR; Etemad-Moghadam S; Dehpour A
    Acta Histochem; 2022 Dec; 124(8):151962. PubMed ID: 36228481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of decalcifying solutions on hemosiderin staining.
    Byard RW; Bellis M
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Sep; 55(5):1356-8. PubMed ID: 20487146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tooth decalcification using different decalcifying agents - A comparative study.
    Khangura AK; Gupta S; Gulati A; Singh S
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2021; 25(3):463-469. PubMed ID: 35281150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Decalcification Techniques for Rat Femurs Using HE and Immunohistochemical Staining.
    Liu H; Zhu R; Liu C; Ma R; Wang L; Chen B; Li L; Niu J; Zhao D; Mo F; Fu M; Brömme D; Zhang D; Gao S
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():9050754. PubMed ID: 28246608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation and comparison of decalcification agents on the human teeth.
    Sanjai K; Kumarswamy J; Patil A; Papaiah L; Jayaram S; Krishnan L
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2012 May; 16(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 22923894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RNA preservation in decalcified cochlear samples.
    Waissbluth S; Chan SW; Chen JZ; McIntosh M; Daniel SJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 23250382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Different Decalcification Methods Using Rat Mandibles as a Model.
    Savi FM; Brierly GI; Baldwin J; Theodoropoulos C; Woodruff MA
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2017 Dec; 65(12):705-722. PubMed ID: 28958188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of various decalcification techniques.
    Prasad P; Donoghue M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 24025875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of different decalcifying agents on EGF and EGFR immunostaining.
    Neves Jdos S; Omar NF; Narvaes EA; Gomes JR; Novaes PD
    Acta Histochem; 2011 Jul; 113(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 20598354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of histological decalcifying agents on number and stainability of gram-positive bacteria.
    Wijnbergen M; Van Mullem PJ
    J Dent Res; 1987 May; 66(5):1029-31. PubMed ID: 2440925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of various decalcification protocols on detection of DNA strand breaks by terminal dUTP nick end labelling.
    Yamamoto-Fukud T; Shibata Y; Hishikawa Y; Shin M; Yamaguchi A; Kobayashi T; Koji T
    Histochem J; 2000 Nov; 32(11):697-702. PubMed ID: 11272810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of EDTA and nitric acid solutions for decalcification of joints in AG/WT, BALB/c, C57, DBA1/J mice, and in Wistar rats.
    Freitas EC; Dalmolin SP; da Silva MM; de Oliveira FH; Pilar EFS
    Biotech Histochem; 2022 Jul; 97(5):372-381. PubMed ID: 34845957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of different decalcifying protocols on Osteopontin and Osteocalcin immunostaining in whole bone specimens of arthritis rat model by confocal immunofluorescence.
    González-Chávez SA; Pacheco-Tena C; Macías-Vázquez CE; Luévano-Flores E
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2013; 6(10):1972-83. PubMed ID: 24133575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Microwave Versus Conventional Decalcification of Teeth Using Three Different Decalcifying Solutions.
    Srinivasyaiah A; Nitin P; Hegde U
    J Lab Physicians; 2016; 8(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 27365920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel approach to decalcification in histopathology laboratory: An adaptation from the Hammersmith protocol.
    Pradhan P; Rajesh NG; Badhe BA; Ilanchezian K; Manimehalai D; Jyothish A
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2019; 62(3):423-429. PubMed ID: 31361231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of decalcifying agents on the staining of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
    Anderson G; Coup AJ
    J Clin Pathol; 1975 Sep; 28(9):744-5. PubMed ID: 51859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Decalcification of histological specimens].
    Petrás S; Krutsay M
    Morphol Igazsagugyi Orv Sz; 1981 Oct; 21(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 6172707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of different decalcification protocols on TUNEL and general cartilage staining.
    Emans PJ; Bulstra SK; Kuijer R
    Biotech Histochem; 2005; 80(3-4):111-5. PubMed ID: 16298895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.