These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6774381)

  • 1. Porcine valves.
    Angell WW; Angell JD
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1980; 23(2):141-66. PubMed ID: 6774381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
    Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prosthetic valves or tissue valves--a vote for mechanical prostheses.
    Horstkotte D
    Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():19-37. PubMed ID: 4096074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
    Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting performance and thromboembolism after porcine xenograft cardiac valve replacement.
    Geha AS; Hammond GL; Laks H; Stansel HC; Glenn WW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Mar; 83(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 7062749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The porcine bioprosthesis. A review of 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement.
    Hatcher CR; Craver JM; Jones EL; Bone DK; Guyton RA
    Am Surg; 1983 Jan; 49(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6600591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-vitro and clinical evaluation of cardiac valve substitutes.
    Kawazoe K; Umezu M; Ohara K; Kaku K; Tomino T; Fujita T; Manabe H
    Jpn Circ J; 1984 Oct; 48(10):1123-9. PubMed ID: 6492377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative clinical experience with porcine bioprosthetic and St. Jude valve replacement.
    Czer LS; Matloff JM; Chaux A; DeRobertis MA; Gray RJ
    Chest; 1987 Apr; 91(4):503-14. PubMed ID: 3829742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aspire porcine bioprosthesis: ten years' experience.
    Hadjinikolaou L; Boehm MC; Ganner C; Kendall SW; Rosin MD; Goldsmith IR; Spyt TJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15700436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term follow-up of different models of mechanical and biological mitral prostheses.
    Vitale N; Giannolo B; Nappi GA; de Luca L; Piazza L; Scardone M; Cotrufo M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1995; 9(4):181-9. PubMed ID: 7605641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long term clinical and haemodynamic evaluation of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft heart valve.
    Ionescu MI; Tandon AP
    Thoraxchir Vask Chir; 1978 Aug; 26(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 694896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Replacement of the mitral and aortic valves with bioprostheses. Long-term results].
    Colombo T; Cicardi C; Peronace B; Pozzi M; Gordini V; Pellegrini A
    G Ital Cardiol; 1985 Oct; 15(10):974-82. PubMed ID: 4092917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Durability of porcine valves at fifteen years in a representative North American patient population.
    Burdon TA; Miller DC; Oyer PE; Mitchell RS; Stinson EB; Starnes VA; Shumway NE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Feb; 103(2):238-51; discussion 251-2. PubMed ID: 1735989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to seventeen years.
    Jamieson WR; Munro AI; Miyagishima RT; Allen P; Burr LH; Tyers GF
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Oct; 60(4):999-1006; discussion 1007. PubMed ID: 7575007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early clinical experience with the Tissuemed porcine bioprosthesis.
    Goldsmith I; Mukundan S; Nugent A; Rosin MD
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S259-63. PubMed ID: 9930460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance.
    Jamieson WR; Allen P; Miyagishima RT; Gerein AN; Munro AI; Burr LH; Tyers GF
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Mar; 99(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 2308373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
    Mykén PS
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Porcine xenograft valves. Long-term (60-89-month) follow-up.
    Lakier JB; Khaja F; Magilligan DJ; Goldstein S
    Circulation; 1980 Aug; 62(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 6772334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age as a determinant for selection of porcine bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement: experience with Carpentier-Edwards standard bioprosthesis.
    Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Janusz MT; Miyagishima RT; Munro AI; Ling H; Burr LH; Tutassaura H
    Can J Cardiol; 1991 May; 7(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 2070287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.