These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6778940)

  • 21. Dentofacial changes in children with negative overjet treated by a combined orthodontic and orthopaedic approach.
    Stensland A; Wisth PJ; Böe OE
    Eur J Orthod; 1988 Feb; 10(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 3162878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The effect of the J. Delaire orthopedic traction face-bow on the facial skeleton: results, new therapeutic trends].
    Salagnac JM
    Orthod Fr; 1988; 59 Pt 2():591-601. PubMed ID: 3271975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Effects of the chin cup on curvature of the cranial base in skeletal Class III treated with splints and intermaxillary elastics].
    Ferro A; Cefariello S
    Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1988 Nov; 29(5):977-85. PubMed ID: 3272580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The chin-cap and its synergistic use with functional therapy in a case of Angle class III].
    Cassarino G; Rizzo R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1983; 32(5):705-9. PubMed ID: 6585617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Extraoral traction and class III treatment.
    Cozzani G
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Dec; 80(6):638-50. PubMed ID: 6947695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Cephalometric change in treatment of severe skeletal Class III malocclusion cases with orthopedic appliance (author's transl)].
    Ikehata T; Nakano K; Okada A; Ishii Y; Takeuchi Y
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jun; 33(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 4530012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An orthodontic/orthopedic correction of the Class III malocclusion in young patients with a modified RPE appliance and a facemask.
    Park JH; Cruz C; Alexander RG
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(3):23-6. PubMed ID: 21032992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effective timing for the application of orthopedic force in the skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Sakamoto T
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Oct; 80(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 6945809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The cervical headgear action in the mixed dentition on maxilla, mandible and teeth in class II, division 1, malocclusions--a cephalometric study (author's transl)].
    Henriques JF; Martins DR; Pinzan A
    Ortodontia; 1979; 12(2):76-86. PubMed ID: 397458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Individual growth study of the effects of chin cap force to the mandible].
    Oda H; Ueda A; Miyagawa Y; Hongou H; Kuroki K; Suzuki M; Suzuki Y
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 48(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 2637322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The improved frontal pull apparatus to the maxilla and results of its use (author's transl)].
    Yamaguchi H; Suzuki T; Takagi S; Kawate T
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1978; 37(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 397298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [A case of skeletal Class III malocclusion with underdevelopment of the middle part of the face and prominence of the mandible - with special regard to the effect of O.M.A].
    Kondo M; Matsui S
    Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1983; 12(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 6582949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The dilemma of Class III treatment. Early or late?
    Campbell PM
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Jul; 53(3):175-91. PubMed ID: 6579869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of protraction headgear on Class III malocclusion.
    Ngan P; Wei SH; Hagg U; Yiu CK; Merwin D; Stickel B
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Mar; 23(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 1641462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The prognosis of the class III case (part III). The prognosis of the deciduous mandibular protrusion (author's transl)].
    Kitaura Y; Yano Y
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1982 Mar; 41(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 6955402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An orthopedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusion in young patients.
    McNamara JA
    J Clin Orthod; 1987 Sep; 21(9):598-608. PubMed ID: 3328750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [An orthodontic examination on changes of soft-tissue profile occurred in anterior cross-bite treatment by using the Moiré topography (author's transl)].
    Yamabe Y; Urano K; Eguchi K; Kamogashira K; Yamada I; Matsumoto M
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Sep; 39(3):330-42. PubMed ID: 6935321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term evaluation after chincap treatment.
    Uner O; Yüksel S; Uçüncü N
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 7781722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.