These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6779574)
1. The BEIR-III Report: origin of the controversy. Fabrikant JI AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Jan; 136(1):209-14. PubMed ID: 6779574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Human health effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: the BEIR III controversy. Radford EP Radiat Res; 1980 Dec; 84(3):369-94. PubMed ID: 6893866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The BEIR III controversy. Fabrikant JI Radiat Res; 1980 Dec; 84(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 6893865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comments on the somatic effects section of the BEIR III report. Rossi HH Radiat Res; 1980 Dec; 84(3):395-406. PubMed ID: 6893867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Common sense about the linear no-threshold controversy-give the general public a break. Leonard BE Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245-6; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Establishment of hygienic standards for ionizing radiation]. Filiushkin IV; Petoian IM Gig Sanit; 1982 Apr; (4):48-51. PubMed ID: 7095464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Policy statement of the International Organization for Medical Physics. Hendee WR; Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):326-7. PubMed ID: 23610093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed decision making trumps informed consent for medical imaging with ionizing radiation. Brink JA; Goske MJ; Patti JA Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 22190652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation. Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses. Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. BEIR V report. Experts urge cautious interpretation of higher risk estimates. Tilyou SM J Nucl Med; 1990 Apr; 31(4):13A-19A. PubMed ID: 2324815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The controversy over the health effects of radiation. Najarian T Technol Rev; 1978 Nov; 81(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 10240301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ionizing radiation. Health effects of low doses]. Tubiana M Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1982; 30(2):131-49. PubMed ID: 7134563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The meaning of low dose and low dose-rate. Wakeford R; Tawn EJ J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20234068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of low level radiation-what's new? Royal HD Semin Nucl Med; 2008 Sep; 38(5):392-402. PubMed ID: 18662560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact and misuse of BEIR V. Vetter RJ Health Phys; 1990 May; 58(5):557-8. PubMed ID: 2341245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biological Effects From Low Doses and Dose Rates of Ionizing Radiation: Science in the Service of Protecting Humans, a Synopsis. Feinendegen LE; Cuttler JM Health Phys; 2018 Jun; 114(6):623-626. PubMed ID: 29521814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Panel review: a review of past risk assessments and extrapolation problems with radiation. Eisenbud M; Burns F; Jones WB; Cohen B J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1980 Mar; 3(4 Spec No):419-30. PubMed ID: 7391735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]