These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Doctor called after crowning: $8.3 million award. Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jan; 28(8):1. PubMed ID: 3344349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [What is the origin of medical standards (regulations regarding medical competence)?]. Wawersik J Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):43-8; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Loss prevention case of the month. J Tenn Med Assoc; 1992 Nov; 85(11):531. PubMed ID: 1434625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [Nursing competence--exemplified by expert assessment of decubitus ulcer prevention]. Jacobs P Krankenpfl J; 2003; 41(4-6):78-83. PubMed ID: 12929311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Is inexperience a defence against negligence? Dyer C Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Aug; 293(6545):497-8. PubMed ID: 3091179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Negligence litigation and medicine. Norman B Anaesthesia; 2011 Aug; 66(8):744; author reply 744-5. PubMed ID: 21749344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. More on asphyxia, cerebral palsy and litigation. Blair E Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 Feb; 40(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 10870790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The irresponsible expert witness: a failure of biomedical graduate education and professional accountability. Brent RL Pediatrics; 1982 Nov; 70(5):754-62. PubMed ID: 7133826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Responses to medical negligence complaints. Melcher D Lancet; 1994 Jul; 344(8917):269. PubMed ID: 7913185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Responding to an accusation of malpractice. Gunderman RB J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Mar; 7(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 20193921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Negligence litigation and medicine. Harrison GR Anaesthesia; 2011 Aug; 66(8):744; author reply 744-5. PubMed ID: 21749343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. [The physician and the malpractice accusation]. Pribilla O Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1988; 46():27-36. PubMed ID: 3178671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The malpractice reform conundrum: does reducing frivolous claims simply lead to more pre-trial appeals? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1994 Aug; 83(8):477-9. PubMed ID: 7822975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches. Hawkins TS J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Affidavit of merit and the expert witness. Weber RD J Mich Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 84(10):22. PubMed ID: 12451908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [Forceps, vacuum suction and cesarean section from the point of view of the neonatologist]. Malaguzzi Valeri O; Ottaviano S Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1976; 97(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10602689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]