These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 678191)

  • 1. Hearing aid evaluations for persons with total postlingual hearing loss.
    Fujikawa S; Owens E
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1978 Aug; 104(8):446-50. PubMed ID: 678191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing aid evaluation for persons with postlingual hearing levels of 90 to 100 dB.
    Fujikawa S; Owens E
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1979 Nov; 105(11):662-5. PubMed ID: 496715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The hearing performance inventory and hearing aid use in profound hearing loss.
    Owens E; Fujikawa S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 23(2):470-9. PubMed ID: 7442205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychoacoustic aspects of speech pattern coding for the deaf.
    Faulkner A; Fourcin AJ; Moore BC
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():172-80. PubMed ID: 2356724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Extensive hearing loss and deafness in adults].
    Laszig R
    Ther Umsch; 1993 Sep; 50(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 8273025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binaural auditory outcomes in patients with postlingual profound unilateral hearing loss: 3 years after cochlear implantation.
    Mertens G; Kleine Punte A; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20 Suppl 1():67-72. PubMed ID: 25997790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of benefit from vibrotactile aid and cochlear implant for postlinguistically deaf adults.
    Skinner MW; Binzer SM; Fredrickson JM; Smith PG; Holden TA; Holden LK; Juelich MF; Turner BA
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1092-9. PubMed ID: 3172956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Smulders YE; van Zon A; Stegeman I; Rinia AB; Van Zanten GA; Stokroos RJ; Hendrice N; Free RH; Maat B; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ; Mylanus EA; Huinck WJ; Smit AL; Topsakal V; Tange RA; Grolman W
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 142(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 26796630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aided versus implanted speech recognition abilities in severe to profound postlingual deafness.
    Kim HN; Chung MH; Shim YJ; Yoon JS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():153-4. PubMed ID: 7668612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid with different auditory profiles: objective and subjective measures.
    van Wieringen A; De Voecht K; Bosman AJ; Wouters J
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 36(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 21414178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre-implant evaluation of speech and hearing.
    Abel SM; Tse SM
    J Otolaryngol; 1987 Oct; 16(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 3682048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Listening to music in hearing loss with and without a hearing aid].
    Feldmann H; Kumpf W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Oct; 67(10):489-97. PubMed ID: 3236982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing aids and lip reading for the rehabilitation of the hard of hearing and deafened persons.
    CONCEPCION I
    J Philipp Med Assoc; 1948 May; 24(5):245-53. PubMed ID: 18864376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The bone-anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness: experience with 58 patients.
    Martin TP; Lowther R; Cooper H; Holder RL; Irving RM; Reid AP; Proops DW
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 35(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 20738337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory assessment strategy and materials for adult and child candidates for cochlear implantation.
    Edgerton BJ; Eisenberg LS; Thielemeir MA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():435-42. PubMed ID: 6575665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of rehabilitation for prelingual deaf children who use cochlear implants in conjunction with hearing aids in the opposite ears].
    Tian Y; Zhou H; Zhang J; Yang D; Xu Y; Guo Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(19):868-70, 873. PubMed ID: 23285948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Directional microphone in hearing aids. Effects on speech discrimination in noise.
    Sung GS; Sung RJ; Angelelli RM
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1975 May; 101(5):316-9. PubMed ID: 1131090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.