These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6784093)

  • 1. Antibacterial activity of five cephalosporins.
    Mutton KJ; Harkness JL
    Pathology; 1981 Jan; 13(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 6784093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefuroxime and cefalotin against 90 bacterial strains].
    Mascellino MT; Prignano G; Iegri F; Lorenzi A
    Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1982; 61(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 6100234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antimicrobial activity and spectrum of cefoperazone against recent clinical isolates.
    Jones RN; Fuchs PC; Barry AL; Gavan TL; Gerlach EH; Sommers HM
    Clin Ther; 1980; 3(Spec Issue):14-23. PubMed ID: 6446389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Susceptibility of cephalothin-resistant gram-negative bacilli to piperacillin, cefuroxime, and other selected antibiotics.
    George WL; Lewis RP; Meyer RD
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Mar; 13(3):484-9. PubMed ID: 122524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Activities of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefuroxime, and cephalothin against 128 clinical isolates.
    Garcia-Rodriguez JA
    Clin Ther; 1980; 3(Spec Issue):117-22. PubMed ID: 6248220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ["In vitro" activity of cefamandole, cefalotin, cefoxitin and cefuroxim against enterobacteria and Staphylococcus aureus isolated in hospital (author's transl)].
    Thabaut A; Durosoir JL; Saliou P
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1979 Dec; 27(10):649-54. PubMed ID: 395496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Antibacterial activity of cefotaxim in comparison with seven cephalosporins].
    Braveny I; Dickert H; Machka K
    Infection; 1979; 7(5):231-6. PubMed ID: 389804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cefuroxime, cefamandole, cefoxitin, and cephalothin in vitro susceptibility tests: reassessment of the "class representative" concept, confirmation of disk interpretive criteria, and proposed quality control guidelines.
    Barry AL; Jones RN; Thornsberry C
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Aug; 80(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 6881092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative in vitro activity of 8 cephalosporins on 109 strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and 60 strains of Neisseria meningitidis.
    Thabaut A; Durosoir JL; Saliou P
    Chemotherapy; 1981; 27 Suppl 1():19-24. PubMed ID: 6265159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro comparison of cefoxitin, cefamandole, cephalexin, and cephalothin.
    Eickhoff TC; Ehret JM
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Jun; 9(6):994-9. PubMed ID: 938029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative in-vitro activity of cefamandole, cefoxitin, cefuroxime and cephalothin.
    Brorson JE; Norrby R
    Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1978; (13):88-93. PubMed ID: 278150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative in vitro activity of first, second and third generation cephalosporins.
    Forsgren A
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B; 1981 Aug; 89(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 6274143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinico-microbiologic bases for the use of new cephalosporins].
    De Bac C; Mascellino MT; Nuti M
    Minerva Med; 1982 Apr; 73(15):899-903. PubMed ID: 6979006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In-vitro activities of cefamandole and cephalothin against 1,881 clinical isolates. A multi-center study.
    Barry AL; Schoenknect FD; Shadomy S; Sherris JC; Thornsberry C; Washington JA; Kammer RB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1979 Nov; 72(5):858-60. PubMed ID: 506998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [In vitro testing of newer cephalosporins (author's transl)].
    Linzenmeier G; Rosenthal E
    Infection; 1979; 7 Suppl 2():S225-7. PubMed ID: 437897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of BL-S786 with cephalothin, cefamandole and cefoxitin in vitro and in treatment of experimental infections in mice.
    Goering RV; Sanders CC; Sanders W
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1978 Apr; 31(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 306989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antibacterial activity of cephamandole--a new antibiotic.
    Goyal P; Bhatia R; Baveja UK; Agarwal DS
    J Commun Dis; 1982 Jun; 14(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 6818272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review of in vitro activity of third-generation cephalosporins and other newer beta-lactam antibiotics against clinically important bacteria.
    Thornsberry C
    Am J Med; 1985 Aug; 79(2A):14-20. PubMed ID: 3927723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of nine cephalosporins against Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.
    Verbist L
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Oct; 10(4):657-63. PubMed ID: 984801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences between cephalothin and newer parenterally absorbed cephalosporins in vitro: a justification for separate disks.
    Washington JA II
    J Infect Dis; 1978 May; 137 Suppl():S32-S37. PubMed ID: 349096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.