These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 678434)

  • 1. The implant test. Six tests for carcinogenicity.
    Longstaff E
    Br J Cancer; 1978 Jun; 37(6):954-9. PubMed ID: 678434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of 4CMB in the subcutaneous implant test.
    Longstaff E; Gaunt C
    Mutat Res; 1982; 100(1-4):395-7. PubMed ID: 6276738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of 6 short-term tests for detecting organic chemical carcinogens.
    Purchase IF; Longstaff E; Ashby J; Styles JA; Anderson D; Lefevre PA; Westwood FR
    Br J Cancer; 1978 Jun; 37(6):873-903. PubMed ID: 354672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rodent carcinogenicity testing.
    Barr JT
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1986 Aug; 7(2):354-7. PubMed ID: 3758553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporation of transplacental exposure into routine carcinogenicity bioassays.
    Swenberg JA
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1979 May; (51):265-8. PubMed ID: 481580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of tests for carcinogenicity and their significance to man.
    Grasso P
    Clin Toxicol; 1976; 9(5):745-60. PubMed ID: 793760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of six short term tests for detecting organic chemical carcinogens and recommendations for their use.
    Purchase IF; Longstaff E; Ashby J; Styles JA; Anderson D; Lefevre PA; Westwood FR
    Nature; 1976 Dec; 264(5587):624-7. PubMed ID: 794741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for carcinogenicity and the problem of pseudocarcinogenicity.
    Roe FJ
    Nature; 1983 Jun 23-29; 303(5919):657-8. PubMed ID: 6855914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Possible methods of carcinogenicity testing for substances used at the place of work.
    Steinhoff D
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1981; 4(1-4):41-6. PubMed ID: 7349803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Procedures for screening chemicals for carcinogenicity.
    Purchase IF
    Br J Ind Med; 1980 Feb; 37(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6989387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical issues in interpretation of chronic bioassay tests for carcinogenicity.
    Gart JJ; Chu KC; Tarone RE
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1979 Apr; 62(4):957-74. PubMed ID: 285297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design of cancer assays for pharmaceutical agents: a reply.
    Boorman GA; Huff JE; Schwetz BA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1986 Aug; 77(2):589-90. PubMed ID: 3461218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Possible importance of detergent in Millipore filter carcinogenesis.
    Andrews EJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1972 Apr; 48(4):1251-4. PubMed ID: 5023683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity from in vitro genetic toxicity.
    Heddle JA
    Mutagenesis; 1988 Jul; 3(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 3062315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Current status of the problem of testing drugs for carcinogenicity].
    Shashkina LF; Ivanova VM; Liubimov BI
    Farmakol Toksikol; 1985; 48(3):107-13. PubMed ID: 3896842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comment on methodology and interpretation of results.
    Tomatis L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1977 Nov; 59(5):1341-2. PubMed ID: 909094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidelines for simple, sensitive significance tests for carcinogenic effects in long-term animal experiments.
    Peto R; Pike MC; Day NE; Gray RG; Lee PN; Parish S; Peto J; Richards S; Wahrendorf J
    IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum Suppl; 1980; (2 Suppl):311-426. PubMed ID: 6935185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental cancer: animal studies and assay procedures.
    Griffin AC
    Tex Rep Biol Med; 1978; 37():45-9. PubMed ID: 752984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the mutagenicity of compounds of known carcinogenicity, belonging to the benz[a]anthracene, chrysene, and cyclopenta[a]phenanthrene series, using Ames's test.
    Coombs MM; Dixon C; Kissonerghis AM
    Cancer Res; 1976 Dec; 36(12):4525-9. PubMed ID: 793712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. British Association for Cancer Research. Chemical carcinogenesis: predictive value of carcinogenicity studies. 30-31 August, 1979, at the University of Surrey, Guildford. (Synopses of invited papers).
    Br J Cancer; 1980 Mar; 41(3):489-508. PubMed ID: 6104502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.