115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6785687)
1. Surgical case review: rationale and methods.
Bell JW
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Feb; 6(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 6785687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The history of surgical audit.
Wright JE
J Qual Clin Pract; 1995 Jun; 15(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 7670721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical care auditing.
Young SR; Hulett RM; van Reesema FS; Griffith E
Hospitals; 1972 Jun; 46(11):68-71. PubMed ID: 5026483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical audit.
Dunn DC
Natl Med J India; 1992; 5(2):50-1. PubMed ID: 1304262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Measures to encourage professional competence.
Gruwez JA
Acta Chir Belg; 1996; 96(5):188-91. PubMed ID: 8950377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Parwani AV; Kuan SF; Rao UN
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 19019767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving the peer review process: develop a professional review committee for better and quicker results.
Agee C
Healthc Exec; 2007; 22(3):72-3. PubMed ID: 17523355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical audit of surgery in a large teaching hospital.
Blanchard RJ; Downs AR
Can J Surg; 1980 May; 23(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 7378962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.
Morris JA; Carrillo Y; Jenkins JM; Smith PW; Bledsoe S; Pichert J; White A
Ann Surg; 2003 Jun; 237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. PubMed ID: 12796581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electronic surveillance system for monitoring surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Voit SB; Todd JK; Nelson B; Nyquist AC
Pediatrics; 2005 Dec; 116(6):1317-22. PubMed ID: 16322153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Organizing for utilization review.
Newmark GL
Hospitals; 1975 Mar; 49(6):22. PubMed ID: 1167842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditing the "firm" by computer.
Holderness J
Health Serv J; 1988 Jan; 98(5085):suppl 2. PubMed ID: 10318003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical audits: why and for whom.
Boult M; Maddern GJ
ANZ J Surg; 2007 Jul; 77(7):572-8. PubMed ID: 17610696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A surgical outcome audit.
Collopy BT
Med J Aust; 1979 Dec; 2(13):689-91. PubMed ID: 530194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the quality of surgical care.
Fink AS; Itani KM; Campbell DC
Surg Clin North Am; 2007 Aug; 87(4):837-52, vi. PubMed ID: 17888783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monitoring clinical performance: a commentary.
Spiegelhalter DJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Dec; 128(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 15573064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. General suggestions for auditing antibiotic usage.
Hoffmann RP
Hosp Pharm; 1980 Mar; 15(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 10245913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical scoring, risk assessment and the surgeon.
Copeland GP
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Jun; 37(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 1404036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: a review of the CUSUM.
Biau DJ; Resche-Rigon M; Godiris-Petit G; Nizard RS; Porcher R
Qual Saf Health Care; 2007 Jun; 16(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 17545347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical audit using predetermined weighted criteria.
Cayten CG; Tanner LA; Riedel DC; Williams KH
Conn Med; 1974 Mar; 38(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 4855990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
