These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Effects of chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on observing responses during a fixed-interval schedule. Branch MN Psychopharmacologia; 1975 Apr; 42(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 1153626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of reinforcer limitations on fixed-ratio responding during repeated administration of chlorpromazine. Smith JB Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1993 Jul; 45(3):565-9. PubMed ID: 8332617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies. Spealman RD; Katz JL; Witkin JM J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Sep; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 702026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interactions among unit-price, fixed-ratio value, and dosing regimen in determining effects of repeated cocaine administration. Yoon JH; Branch MN Behav Processes; 2004 Nov; 67(3):363-81. PubMed ID: 15518987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of d-amphetamine on observing behavior in the squirrel monkey. Clark FC J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 Nov; 12(6):977-87. PubMed ID: 4982673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conjunctive schedules of reinforcement. I. Rate-dependent effects of pentobarbital and d-amphetamine. Barrett JE J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Nov; 22(3):561-73. PubMed ID: 4436616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action. Pitts RC; Febbo SM Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective antagonism of the rate-decreasing effect of d-amphetamine by chlorpromazine in a repeated-acquisition task. Thompson DM J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jul; 34(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 7420010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of methadone on operant behavior maintained with and without conditioned reinforcement in the pigeon. Kelly TH; Thompson T Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 86(1-2):212-6. PubMed ID: 3927358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrasting baseline-dependent effects of amphetamine, chlorpromazine and scopolamine on response switching in the pigeon. Evenden JL Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1986; 89(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 3092272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations. Lieving GA; Reilly MP; Lattal KA J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17002227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of chlorpromazine and imipramine on rate and stimulus control of matching to sample. Newland MC; Marr MJ J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Jul; 44(1):49-68. PubMed ID: 4045376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of diazepam and chlorpromazine on socially induced anxiety in pigeons. Inagawa K; Watanabe S Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 1991 Dec; 1(4):549-54. PubMed ID: 1822320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Drug effects on multiple and alternating mixed-schedule performance. Leander JD J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1981 Sep; 218(3):728-33. PubMed ID: 7264956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combinations of response-dependent and response-independent schedule-correlated stimulus presentation in an observing procedure. DeFulio A; Hackenberg TD J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 18540216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing the reinforcing properties of S-: a replication of Lieberman's procedure. Mueller KL; Dinsmoor JA J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 6699539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]