82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6790886)
1. [Higher costs but limited benefits with two-picture mammography in screening].
Lundgren B; Medin B
Lakartidningen; 1981 Jun; 78(25):2455-7. PubMed ID: 6790886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Excellent results of mammography screening. Still balancing between cost-benefit analysis].
Andersson I
Lakartidningen; 1998 Apr; 95(18):2042-5, 2048-50. PubMed ID: 9621585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years.
Xu W; Vnenchak P; Smucny J
J Fam Pract; 2000 Mar; 49(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 10735487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography 1984: challenge to radiology.
McLelland R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Jul; 143(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 6428201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.
Hensel WA
N Engl J Med; 2003 Aug; 349(6):610-2; author reply 610-2. PubMed ID: 12904529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What are the benefits and costs of screening mammograms on Kentucky women aged 40-49?
Spratt JS; Gaines BM; Aaron WS; Cerrito P
J Surg Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 8888797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Offering mammography is beneficial in the long run].
Cederblom S
Lakartidningen; 1995 Dec; 92(51-52):4865-8. PubMed ID: 8544497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening mammography in a primary care setting.
Nesin N; Elliott BA; Elliott TE
Minn Med; 1988 Apr; 71(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 3412280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening for breast cancer in a low socioeconomic group of Iranian women.
Barfar E; Rashidian A; Hosseini H; Nosratnejad S; Barooti E; Zendehdel K
Arch Iran Med; 2014 Apr; 17(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 24724599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance goals for an adjunct diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies after screening mammography: analysis of costs, benefits, and consequences.
Lee CI; Bensink ME; Berry K; Musa Z; Bodnar C; Dann R; Jarvik JG; Lehman CD; Ramsey SD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):924-30. PubMed ID: 24295942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mammography screening as early detection measure. Pro].
Koch MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1996; 259 Suppl 1():S161-77. PubMed ID: 9133270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Breast cancer screening by mammography in Sweden].
Andersson I; Hellström L; Bjurstam N; Lundgren B; Fagerberg G; Tabár L
Lakartidningen; 1983 Jun; 80(25):2559-62. PubMed ID: 6621186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography screening under 50: a limited perspective on a multifaceted issue.
Royak-Schaler R; Gallant SJ; Klabunde CN
Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):243-9; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9421559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Studies weigh cost, effectiveness of mammography.
Cancer Discov; 2014 May; 4(5):OF5. PubMed ID: 24795028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of costs and benefits of breast cancer screening with mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI.
Feig S
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2011 Mar; 38(1):179-96, ix. PubMed ID: 21419333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography].
Iinuma T
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cost-Effectiveness of using Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) in digital mammography].
Aparecido Nunes A; Barbosa Coelho E; de Souza JP; Zangiacomi Martinez E; Wichert Ana L; do Valle Lessa Dallora ME; de Azevedo Marques PM; de Mello LM
Value Health Reg Issues; 2016 Dec; 11():49-56. PubMed ID: 27986198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits and costs of screening and treatment for early breast cancer. Development of a basic benefit package.
Kattlove H; Liberati A; Keeler E; Brook RH
JAMA; 1995 Jan; 273(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 7799495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
