These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6791875)
21. Application of 80-kVp scan and raw data-based iterative reconstruction for reduced iodine load abdominal-pelvic CT in patients at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy referred for oncological assessment: effects on radiation dose, image quality and renal function. Nagayama Y; Tanoue S; Tsuji A; Urata J; Furusawa M; Oda S; Nakaura T; Utsunomiya D; Yoshida E; Yoshida M; Kidoh M; Tateishi M; Yamashita Y Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20170632. PubMed ID: 29470108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. CT method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate--clinical experience in 525 cases. Giuliano V; Giuliano C; Pinto F; Scaglione M Emerg Radiol; 2005 Jul; 11(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 16133622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessing the clinical utility of color Doppler ultrasound for ovarian torsion in the setting of a negative contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis. Lam A; Nayyar M; Helmy M; Houshyar R; Marfori W; Lall C Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3206-13. PubMed ID: 26353897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients. Kalra MK; Maher MM; Kamath RS; Horiuchi T; Toth TL; Halpern EF; Saini S Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):241-9. PubMed ID: 15454622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Metal artifact reduction software used with abdominopelvic dual-energy CT of patients with metal hip prostheses: assessment of image quality and clinical feasibility. Han SC; Chung YE; Lee YH; Park KK; Kim MJ; Kim KW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):788-95. PubMed ID: 25247944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Time-density evaluation of the liver after iosulamide meglumine: a tissue-specific CT contrast agent. Marincek B; Young SW; Enzmann DR Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 7076441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Abdominal trauma: use of oral contrast material for CT is safe. Federle MP; Yagan N; Peitzman AB; Krugh J Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 9314968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sequential changes in the CT numbers of the normal canine kidney following intravenous contrast administration. II: The renal medulla. Brennan RE; Curtis JA; Pollack HM; Weinberg I Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 468497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Anaphylactoid reaction after oral administration of diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium solution. Miller SH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):959-61. PubMed ID: 9124149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic hepatic CT: uniphasic and biphasic contrast medium injection protocols. Drop A Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 1999; 54():195-204. PubMed ID: 11205764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast enhancement in abdominal CT: bolus vs. infusion. Burgener FA; Hamlin DJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Aug; 137(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 6789645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Studies on contrast enhancement in gynecologic pelvic computed tomography (author's transl)]. Miyasaka Y Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Aug; 33(8):1219-26. PubMed ID: 7276649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Liposomes loaded with contrast material for image enhancement in computed tomography. Work in progress. Ryan PJ; Davis MA; DeGaeta LR; Woda B; Melchior DL Radiology; 1984 Sep; 152(3):759-62. PubMed ID: 6611564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality? Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Multislice spiral CT angiography in the evaluation of the anatomy of splanchnic vessels: preliminary experience]. Laghi A; Catalano C; Iannaccone R; Paolantonio P; Panebianco V; Sansoni I; Trenna S; Passariello R Radiol Med; 2001 Sep; 102(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 11677453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography. Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. IV contrast material for abdominal CT: comparison of three methods of administration. Platt JF; Glazer GM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):275-7. PubMed ID: 3293372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pretreatment of patients requiring oral contrast abdominal computed tomography with antiemetics: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Garra G; Singer AJ; Bamber D; Chohan J; Troxell R; Thode HC Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 53(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 18640743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]