These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6791875)

  • 41. Prostacyclin (PGI2) and thromboxane (TXA2) levels during intravenous contrast medium administration in CT.
    Paajanen H; Kormano M
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 3896802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. CT in abdominal and pelvic trauma.
    Roberts JL; Dalen K; Bosanko CM; Jafir SZ
    Radiographics; 1993 Jul; 13(4):735-52. PubMed ID: 8356265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bowel opacification for abdominal computed tomography in children: a clinical trial of oral Telebrix 38.
    Tannous WN; Azouz EM
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Apr; 42(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 2039951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Role of Spiral and Multislice Computed Tomography in the evaluation of traumatic and spontaneous oesophageal perforation. Our experience.
    De Lutio di Castelguidone E; Pinto A; Merola S; Stavolo C; Romano L
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 15775894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Value of contrast-enhanced CT in detecting active hemorrhage in patients with blunt abdominal or pelvic trauma.
    Shanmuganathan K; Mirvis SE; Sover ER
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 8517323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The optimal contrast media policy in CT of the liver. Part I: Technical notes.
    Rengo M; Bellini D; De Cecco CN; Osimani M; Vecchietti F; Caruso D; Maceroni MM; Lucchesi P; Iafrate F; Paolantonio P; Ferrari R; Laghi A
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun; 52(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 21498281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison between a fixed-dose contrast protocol and a weight-based contrast dosing protocol in abdominal CT.
    George AJ; Manghat NE; Hamilton MC
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Dec; 71(12):1314.e1-1314.e9. PubMed ID: 27557991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Weight-adapted iodinated contrast media administration in abdomino-pelvic CT: Can image quality be maintained?
    Perrin E; Jackson M; Grant R; Lloyd C; Chinaka F; Goh V
    Radiography (Lond); 2018 Feb; 24(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 29306370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Contrast enhancement].
    Wójtowicz J
    Pol Przegl Radiol Med Nukl; 1982; 46(4):179-86. PubMed ID: 6763211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The use of dilute Calogen as a fat density oral contrast medium in upper abdominal computed tomography, compared with the use of water and positive oral contrast media.
    Ramsay DW; Markham DH; Morgan B; Rodgers PM; Liddicoat AJ
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Aug; 56(8):670-3. PubMed ID: 11467870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Multiphase acquisitions in pediatric abdominal-pelvic CT are a common practice and contribute to unnecessary radiation dose.
    Rostad BS; Applegate KE; Kim T; Mansour RM; Milla SS
    Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Nov; 48(12):1714-1723. PubMed ID: 29980861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Contrast enhancement of hepatic tumors in CT: comparison between bolus and infusion techniques.
    Burgener FA; Hamlin DJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Feb; 140(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 6600346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Negative contrast in x-ray computed tomography. Preliminary study].
    Reck A; Eisenscher A; Prevot G; Salze P; Weisse D
    J Radiol; 1987 Dec; 68(12):815-8. PubMed ID: 3446817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose.
    Bae KT; Shah AJ; Shang SS; Wang JH; Chang S; Kanematsu M; Hildebolt CF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1589-94. PubMed ID: 18941106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of neutral oral contrast versus positive oral contrast medium in abdominal multidetector CT.
    Berther R; Patak MA; Eckhardt B; Erturk SM; Zollikofer CL
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1902-9. PubMed ID: 18414870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Oral contrast agents in CT of the abdomen.
    Garrett PR; Meshkov SL; Perlmutter GS
    Radiology; 1984 Nov; 153(2):545-6. PubMed ID: 6484186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Can independent coronal multiplanar reformatted images obtained using state-of-the-art MDCT scanners be used for primary interpretation of MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis? A feasibility study.
    Sebastian S; Kalra MK; Mittal P; Saini S; Small WC
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 17408899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult Emergency Department patients.
    Lee SY; Coughlin B; Wolfe JM; Polino J; Blank FS; Smithline HA
    Emerg Radiol; 2006 May; 12(4):150-7. PubMed ID: 16738930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Contrast media for computer tomography of the liver.
    Wegener OH; Mützel W; Souchon R
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1980; 21(2A):239-47. PubMed ID: 7424559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. "Hot" spots in hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanning of the abdomen: protocols, indications, interpretation, responsibilities, and reimbursements.
    Maher MM; Kalra MK; Singh A; Blake MA; Aquino SL; Fischman AJ; Mueller PR
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2006; 35(2):35-54. PubMed ID: 16517288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.