These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6792162)

  • 21. Intergenomic epistasis for fitness: within-population interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genes in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Dowling DK; Friberg U; Hailer F; Arnqvist G
    Genetics; 2007 Jan; 175(1):235-44. PubMed ID: 17151264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Epistasis for quantitative traits in Drosophila.
    Mackay TF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1253():47-70. PubMed ID: 25403527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selection, epistasis, and parent-of-origin effects on deleterious mutations across environments in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wang AD; Sharp NP; Spencer CC; Tedman-Aucoin K; Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2009 Dec; 174(6):863-74. PubMed ID: 19852616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Linkage disequilibrium in isolated populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Yamaguchi O; Ichinose M; Matsuda M; Mukai T
    Genetics; 1980 Oct; 96(2):507-22. PubMed ID: 6790333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A measure of the within-chromosome synergistic epistasis for Drosophila viability.
    Rosa JM; Camacho S; García-Dorado A
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1130-7. PubMed ID: 16033587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Variance component analysis of bristle characters in local populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ichinose M; Tachida H; Mukai T
    Jpn J Genet; 1992 Dec; 67(6):449-61. PubMed ID: 1304769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inversion polymorphism in Indian natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Singh BN; Das A
    Genome; 1990 Jun; 33(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 2116984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative genetics of functional characters in Drosophila melanogaster populations subjected to laboratory selection.
    Teotónio H; Matos M; Rose MR
    J Genet; 2004 Dec; 83(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 15689629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories.
    Weinreich DM; Watson RA; Chao L
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1165-74. PubMed ID: 16050094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of retrotransposons as markers for mapping genes responsible for fitness differences between related Drosophila melanogaster strains.
    Nuzhdin SV; Keightley PD; Pasyukova EG
    Genet Res; 1993 Oct; 62(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 8276230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The decline in fitness with inbreeding: evidence for negative dominance-by-dominance epistasis in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):857-64. PubMed ID: 26709722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetic variation for total fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: complex yet replicable patterns.
    Gardner MP; Fowler K; Barton NH; Partridge L
    Genetics; 2005 Mar; 169(3):1553-71. PubMed ID: 15545656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative genetics of seminal receptacle length in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Miller GT; Starmer WT; Pitnick S
    Heredity (Edinb); 2001 Jul; 87(Pt 1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11678984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of lethal selection on the EST-6 to PGM region of chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Cochrane BJ; Richmond RC
    Genetics; 1980 Oct; 96(2):491-506. PubMed ID: 6455326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selection of viability at loci controlling protein polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster is very weak at most.
    Mukai T; Tachida H; Ichinose M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1980 Aug; 77(8):4857-60. PubMed ID: 6776527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Epistasis for head morphology in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Özsoy ED; Yılmaz M; Patlar B; Emecen G; Durmaz E; Magwire MM; Zhou S; Huang W; Anholt RRH; Mackay TFC
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34568933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A genetic analysis of phototactic behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Hybridization of divergent populations.
    Markow TA
    Behav Genet; 1975 Oct; 5(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 811203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Selection on Inversion Breakpoints Favors Proximity to Pairing Sensitive Sites in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Corbett-Detig RB
    Genetics; 2016 Sep; 204(1):259-65. PubMed ID: 27343234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Further evidence for latitudinal inversion clines in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster from India.
    Singh BN; Das A
    J Hered; 1992; 83(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 1624769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Negative selection in humans and fruit flies involves synergistic epistasis.
    Sohail M; Vakhrusheva OA; Sul JH; Pulit SL; Francioli LC; ; ; van den Berg LH; Veldink JH; de Bakker PIW; Bazykin GA; Kondrashov AS; Sunyaev SR
    Science; 2017 May; 356(6337):539-542. PubMed ID: 28473589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.