BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6794874)

  • 1. Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry. III. Comparison with trunk calcium by neutron activation analysis.
    Mazess RB; Peppler WW; Harrison JE; McNeill KG
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1981; 33(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 6794874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry. II. Comparison with total body calcium by neutron activation analysis.
    Mazess RB; Peppler WW; Chesnut CH; Nelp WB; Cohn SH; Zanzi I
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1981; 33(4):361-3. PubMed ID: 6794873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry. I. Theory and measurement procedure.
    Peppler WW; Mazess RB
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1981; 33(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 6794872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Total body bone mineral in vivo by dual photon absorptiometry. II. Accuracy.
    Gotfredsen A; Borg J; Christiansen C; Mazess RB
    Clin Physiol; 1984 Aug; 4(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 6540647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.
    Mazess RB; Peppler WW; Chesney RW; Lange TA; Lindgren U; Smith E
    J Nucl Med; 1984 Mar; 25(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 6699720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-photon absorptiometry: comparison of bone mineral and soft tissue mass measurements in vivo with established methods.
    Heymsfield SB; Wang J; Heshka S; Kehayias JJ; Pierson RN
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1989 Jun; 49(6):1283-9. PubMed ID: 2729167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertebral bone mineral measurement using dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.
    Eriksson S; Isberg B; Lindgren U
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 2964852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine, II. correlation between forearm BMC and lumbar spine BMC.
    Krølner B; Pors Nielsen S; Lund B; Lund B; Sørensen OH; Uhrenholdt A
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1980; 40(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 7466295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between local and total body bone mineral in epileptic patients and normal subjects.
    Tjellesen L; Gotfredsen A; Borg J; Christiansen C
    Clin Physiol; 1983 Aug; 3(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 6684520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total body calcium and bone mineral content: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with neutron activation analysis.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ; Hergenroeder A; Perez M; Abrams S
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Jun; 11(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 8725182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The diagnostic validity of local and total bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.
    Nilas L; Gotfredsen A; Riis BJ; Christiansen C
    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 1986 Dec; 25(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 3652471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total body composition by dual-photon (153Gd) absorptiometry.
    Mazess RB; Peppler WW; Gibbons M
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1984 Oct; 40(4):834-9. PubMed ID: 6486091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of radial bone mineral content with total body calcium in chronic renal failure.
    Cohn SH; Ellis KJ; Caselnova RC; Asad SN; Letteri JM
    J Lab Clin Med; 1975 Dec; 86(6):910-9. PubMed ID: 1194756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normalization of bone mineral content to height, weight, and lean body mass: implications for clinical use.
    Christensen MS; Christiansen C; Naestoft J; McNair P; Transbøl I
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1981; 33(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 6780155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between 153Gd and 241Am, 137Cs for dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine.
    Smith MA; Sutton D; Tothill P
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 Jun; 28(6):709-21. PubMed ID: 6878429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of total body calcium from the bone mineral content of the forearm.
    Christiansen C; Rödbro P
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1975 Sep; 35(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 1188297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between local and total bone mineral in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and normal subjects.
    Skibsted Als O; Gotfredsen A; Christiansen C
    Clin Rheumatol; 1983 Sep; 2(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 6678700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men.
    Modlesky CM; Lewis RD; Yetman KA; Rose B; Rosskopf LB; Snow TK; Sparling PB
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 64(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 8901784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between local and total bone mineral in normal pubertal boys.
    Krabbe S; Gotfredsen A; Christiansen C
    Eur J Pediatr; 1984 Dec; 143(2):149-51. PubMed ID: 6335091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone mineral content by photon absorptiometry of the mandible compared with that of the forearm and the lumbar spine.
    von Wowern N; Storm TL; Olgaard K
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1988 Mar; 42(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 3130164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.