These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6796019)

  • 1. [Value of the automated analysis of the electrocardiogram by the Telemed program (V version)].
    Bernard P; Chaitman BR; Scholl JM; Chabot M
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Oct; 74(10):1155-62. PubMed ID: 6796019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Where do derived precordial leads fail?
    Gregg RE; Zhou SH; Lindauer JM; Feild DQ; Helfenbein ED
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 18817921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of 3 ECG computer programs with interpretation by physicians].
    Saner H; Lindeland A; Scallen R; Paule W; Lange HW; Gobel FL
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jul; 117(27-28):1035-9. PubMed ID: 3303319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated detection of Brugada-type electrocardiogram using diagnostic criteria of the European Society of Cardiology and the American Heart Association.
    Kaneko M; Isobe N; Yamaki T; Okamoto N; Watanabe Y; Iwatsuka T; Sakurai T; Kishi R; Nakazawa K; Miyake F
    J Electrocardiol; 2005 Oct; 38(4 Suppl):96-9. PubMed ID: 16226082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The Caceres-USPHS (version HP-3) computer program. Evaluation of automatic analysis of 40,000 ECG (author's transl)].
    Feruglio GA; Feraco E; Maisano G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975; 5(2):262-71. PubMed ID: 1102374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative diagnostic performance of the Telemed computer ECG program.
    Bernard P; Chaitman BR; Scholl JM; Val PG; Chabot M
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Jan; 16(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 6220102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of a new reduced lead set ECG with the standard ECG for diagnosing cardiac arrhythmias and myocardial ischemia.
    Drew BJ; Pelter MM; Brodnick DE; Yadav AV; Dempel D; Adams MG
    J Electrocardiol; 2002; 35 Suppl():13-21. PubMed ID: 12539095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Sekiguchi K; Kanda T; Osada M; Tsunoda Y; Kodajima N; Fukumura Y; Suzuki T; Kobayashi I
    J Med; 1999; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experiences with different computerprograms for the ECG-analysis.
    Meyer J; Heinrich KW; Merx W; Effert S
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975; 5(2):279-87. PubMed ID: 1102376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.
    Guglin ME; Thatai D
    Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 106(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 16321696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrocardiogram differentiation of benign early repolarization versus acute myocardial infarction by emergency physicians and cardiologists.
    Turnipseed SD; Bair AE; Kirk JD; Diercks DB; Tabar P; Amsterdam EA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Sep; 13(9):961-6. PubMed ID: 16885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrocardiographic ST segment elevation: a comparison of AMI and non-AMI ECG syndromes.
    Brady WJ; Perron AD; Ullman EA; Syverud SA; Holstege C; Riviello R; Ghammaghami C
    Am J Emerg Med; 2002 Nov; 20(7):609-12. PubMed ID: 12442239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency of acute coronary syndrome in patients with normal electrocardiogram performed during presence or absence of chest pain.
    Turnipseed SD; Trythall WS; Diercks DB; Laurin EG; Kirk JD; Smith DS; Main DN; Amsterdam EA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 16(6):495-9. PubMed ID: 19426294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Fully automatic computer-analysis of electrocardiograms in clinical routine (author's transl)].
    Mengden HJ; Just H; Kaspar W; Löllgen H; Kersting F
    Z Kardiol; 1978 Oct; 67(10):707-16. PubMed ID: 366940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].
    Morisbak B; Gjesdal K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in the pediatric emergency department.
    Wathen JE; Rewers AB; Yetman AT; Schaffer MS
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Dec; 46(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 16308065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ST-segment depression as a risk factor in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    Haghjoo M; Mohammadzadeh S; Taherpour M; Faghfurian B; Fazelifar AF; Alizadeh A; Rad MA; Sadr-Ameli MA
    Europace; 2009 May; 11(5):643-9. PubMed ID: 19164362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis.
    Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified electrode placement must be recorded when performing 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Jowett NI; Turner AM; Cole A; Jones PA
    Postgrad Med J; 2005 Feb; 81(952):122-5. PubMed ID: 15701746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.