These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. The boston corpus of aphasic naming errors. Goodglass H; Wingfield A; Hyde MR Brain Lang; 1998 Aug; 64(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 9675042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An investigation of naming errors following semantic and phonemic cueing. Li EC; Williams SE Neuropsychologia; 1991; 29(11):1083-93. PubMed ID: 1723180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Compounds in different aphasia categories: a study on picture naming. Semenza C; De Pellegrin S; Battel I; Garzon M; Meneghello F; Chiarelli V J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Dec; 33(10):1099-107. PubMed ID: 21978375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preserved object recognition and reading comprehension in optic aphasia. Coslett HB; Saffran EM Brain; 1989 Aug; 112 ( Pt 4)():1091-110. PubMed ID: 2775993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Object naming in aphasics--the lack of effect of context or realism. Hatfield FM; Howard D; Barber J; Jones C; Morton J Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(6):717-27. PubMed ID: 600366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Age-related deficits in guided search using cues. Gottlob LR Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 16953714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sensitivity to functors in Japanese aphasics. Kudo T; Tateishi M; Kashiwagi T; Segawa N Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 6186941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How Much Time Do People With Aphasia Need to Respond During Picture Naming? Estimating Optimal Response Time Cutoffs Using a Multinomial Ex-Gaussian Approach. Evans WS; Hula WD; Quique Y; Starns JJ J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 63(2):599-614. PubMed ID: 32073336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Thematic role assignment in patients with Broca's aphasia: sentence-picture matching electrified. Wassenaar M; Hagoort P Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):716-40. PubMed ID: 17005212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Homographic and heterographic homophones in speech production: does orthography matter? Biedermann B; Nickels L Cortex; 2008 Jun; 44(6):683-97. PubMed ID: 18472038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pre-articulatory electrical activity associated with correct naming in individuals with aphasia. Singh T; Phillip L; Behroozmand R; Gleichgerrcht E; Piai V; Fridriksson J; Bonilha L Brain Lang; 2018; 177-178():1-6. PubMed ID: 29421267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Acquisition and maintenance of scripts in aphasia: a comparison of two cuing conditions. Cherney LR; Kaye RC; van Vuuren S Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2014 May; 23(2):S343-60. PubMed ID: 24686911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Spatial attentional shifts: implications for the role of polysensory mechanisms. Buchtel HA; Butter CM Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 3405396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Naming in aphasia: interacting effects of form and function. Whitehouse P; Caramazza A; Zurif E Brain Lang; 1978 Jul; 6(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 698785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Normative data for the Brazilian population in the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination: influence of schooling. Radanovic M; Mansur LL; Scaff M Braz J Med Biol Res; 2004 Nov; 37(11):1731-8. PubMed ID: 15517090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessing the influence of sound parameters on crossmodal cuing in different regions of space. Lee J; Spence C Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():96-103. PubMed ID: 29438877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]