BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6803265)

  • 1. Use of the FBX dosemeter for the calibration of cobalt-60 and high-energy teletherapy machines.
    Gupta BL; Kini UR; Bhat RM; Madhvanath U
    Phys Med Biol; 1982 Feb; 27(2):235-45. PubMed ID: 6803265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(6):741-71. PubMed ID: 6419029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of physical parameters associated with the measurement of high-energy x-ray penumbra.
    Dawson DJ; Harper JM; Akinradewo AC
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 6434915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response of the FBX system to a carbon beam: its potential as a dosimeter in heavy particle radiotherapy.
    Semwal MK; Banerjee M; Sarma A; Vidyasagar PB
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Jun; 47(12):N179-83. PubMed ID: 12118611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative beam data for the 25 MV betatron, 8, 6, and 4 MV linear accelerators, and 60Co units. Central-axis depth dose, field flatness, and decrement lines.
    Chan FK; Haymond HR; Kagan AR; Carbone GE; George FW
    Radiology; 1973 Dec; 109(3):691-701. PubMed ID: 4203940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study of dose distribution patterns from cobalt-60 and Varian Clinac-4 beams.
    Nair R; Kartha M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jan; 130(1):150-3. PubMed ID: 413401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wedge factor dependence on depth and field size for various beam energies using symmetric and half-collimated asymmetric jaw settings.
    Niroomand-Rad A; Haleem M; Rodgers J; Obcemea C
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(6):1445-50. PubMed ID: 1461208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface doses for acrylic versus lead acrylic blocking trays for Co-60, 8-MV, and 17-MV photons.
    Bova FJ; Hill LW
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(2):254-6. PubMed ID: 6408367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the NMIJ and the ARPANSA standards for absorbed dose to water in high-energy photon beams.
    Shimizu M; Morishita Y; Kato M; Tanaka T; Kurosawa T; Takata N; Saito N; Ramanathan G; Harty PD; Oliver C; Wright T; Butler DJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 25209996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The calibration of plane parallel ionisation chambers for the measurement of absorbed dose in electron beams of low to medium energies. Part 1: the NACP chamber.
    Cross P; Freeman N
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Sep; 19(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 8936730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Point/Counterpoint. Calibration of radiotherapy ionization chambers using Co-60 is outdated and should be replaced by direct calibration in linear accelerator beams.
    Ganesan R; McEwen MR; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5003-6. PubMed ID: 26328950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verification of absorbed doses determined with thimble and parallel-plate ionization chambers in clinical electron beams using ferrous sulphate dosimetry.
    Van der Plaetsen A; Seuntjens J; Thierens H; Vynckier S
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 8164587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small-beam calibration by 0.6- and 0.2-cm3 ionization chambers.
    Engler MJ; Jones GL
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):822-6. PubMed ID: 6439992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peripheral dose from megavolt beams.
    Fraass BA; van de Geijn J
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(6):809-18. PubMed ID: 6419031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the perturbation correction in a parallel plate and a cylindrical ion chamber.
    Jones D
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):239-41. PubMed ID: 6798388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinic based transfer of the N(D,W)(60Co) calibration coefficient using a linear accelerator.
    Abdel-Rahman W; Evans MD; Serré L; McCaffrey JP; Podgorsak EB; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):929-38. PubMed ID: 19378753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative response of alanine dosemeters for high-energy electrons determined using a Fricke primary standard.
    Vörös S; Anton M; Boillat B
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1413-32. PubMed ID: 22349609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Viability of an isocentric cobalt-60 teletherapy unit for stereotactic radiosurgery.
    Poffenbarger BA; Podgorsak EB
    Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):1935-43. PubMed ID: 9800701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface dose for megavoltage photon beams outside the treatment field.
    Starkschall G; St George FJ; Zellmer DL
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(6):906-10. PubMed ID: 6419036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.
    Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG;
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.