These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6803266)

  • 21. Photon contamination in 8-20-MeV electron beams from a linear accelerator.
    Gur D; Bukovitz AG; Serago C
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(2):145-6. PubMed ID: 111019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Photon beams for radiosurgery produced by laser Compton backscattering from relativistic electrons.
    Girolami B; Larsson B; Preger M; Schaerf C; Stepanek J
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Sep; 41(9):1581-96. PubMed ID: 8884899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Backscattered dose perturbation effects at metallic interfaces irradiated by high-energy X- and gamma-ray therapeutic beams.
    Ravikumar M; Ravichandran R; Sathiyan S; Supe SS
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Mar; 180(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 14991206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Permanent-magnet energy spectrometer for electron beams from radiotherapy accelerators.
    McLaughlin DJ; Hogstrom KR; Carver RL; Gibbons JP; Shikhaliev PM; Matthews KL; Clarke T; Henderson A; Liang EP
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5517-29. PubMed ID: 26328999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.
    Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The peripheral dose outside the applicator in electron beams of Oncor linear accelerator.
    Iktueren B; Bilge H; Karacam S; Atkovar G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jun; 150(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 22025738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beam generation and planar imaging at energies below 2.40 MeV with carbon and aluminum linear accelerator targets.
    Parsons D; Robar JL
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4568-78. PubMed ID: 22830788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of ionisation measurements in water and polystyrene for electron beam dosimetry.
    Bruinvis IA; Heukelom S; Mijnheer BJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1985 Oct; 30(10):1043-53. PubMed ID: 4070361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dose properties of a laser accelerated electron beam and prospects for clinical application.
    Kainz KK; Hogstrom KR; Antolak JA; Almond PR; Bloch CD; Chiu C; Fomytskyi M; Raischel F; Downer M; Tajima T
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2053-67. PubMed ID: 15305458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Field size dependence of effective source distance and field factors of a 9 MeV electron beam.
    Baggarley SP; Mannering DM; Hugtenburg RP; Turner JR
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1994 Jun; 17(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 8074618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validation of a Monte Carlo model of a NACP-02 plane-parallel ionization chamber model using electron backscatter experiments.
    Chin E; Shipley D; Bailey M; Seuntjens J; Palmans H; Dusautoy A; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(8):N119-26. PubMed ID: 18364552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Leakage radiation from electron applicators on a medical accelerator.
    Pennington EC; Jani SK; Wen BC
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(5):763-5. PubMed ID: 3141759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dose enhancement from backscattered radiation at tissue-metal interfaces irradiated with high energy electrons.
    Gagnon WF; Cundiff JH
    Br J Radiol; 1980 May; 53(629):466-70. PubMed ID: 7388280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An isodose shift technique for obliquely incident electron beams.
    Ulin K; Sternick ES
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(6):905-10. PubMed ID: 2511399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of backscatter on cell survival for a clinical electron beam.
    Weeks KJ; Buchsbaum DJ; Terry VH; Ten Haken RK
    Radiother Oncol; 1991 Aug; 21(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 1924865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the initial angular variances of clinical electron beams.
    van Battum LJ; Huizenga H
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Nov; 44(11):2803-20. PubMed ID: 10588286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparisons of electron beam dose measurements in water and polystyrene using various dosimeters.
    Kase KR; Adler GJ; Bjärngard BE
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6804767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Dose distributions of fast electrons with an energy of 7-24 Mev in electromagnetic beam formation].
    Shambulov RS; Khvan GV; Saĭbekov TS; Azhigaliev NA; Shuinbekov AD
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1983 Mar; 28(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 6403798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of backscatter dose from internal lead shielding in clinical electron beams using EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulations.
    De Vries RJ; Marsh S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):139–150. PubMed ID: 26699566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Backscatter dose effects for high atomic number materials being irradiated in the presence of a magnetic field: A Monte Carlo study for the MRI linac.
    Ahmad SB; Sarfehnia A; Kim A; Wronski M; Sahgal A; Keller BM
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4665. PubMed ID: 27487883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.