These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6804162)
1. A randomized, double-blind study of two combined and two progestogen-only oral contraceptives. Sheth A; Jain U; Sharma S; Adatia A; Patankar S; Andolsek L; Pretnar-Darovec A; Belsey MA; Hall PE; Parker RA; Ayeni S; Pinol A; Li Hoi Foo C Contraception; 1982 Mar; 25(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 6804162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized, double-blind study of six combined oral contraceptives. Contraception; 1982 Mar; 25(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 6804161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical comparison of two triphasic oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel or norethindrone: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Masson S; Franssen E; Hilditch JR; Powell MG Contraception; 1993 Jan; 47(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8436001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective controlled study of the effect on blood pressure of contraceptive preparations containing different types and dosages of progestogen. Wilson ES; Cruickshank J; McMaster M; Weir RJ Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Dec; 91(12):1254-60. PubMed ID: 6440589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized, double-blind study of two combined oral contraceptives containing the same progestogen, but different estrogens. World Health Organization Task Force on Oral Contraception. Contraception; 1980 May; 21(5):445-59. PubMed ID: 7428356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized double-blind trial of two low dose combined oral contraceptives. Bounds W; Vessey M; Wiggins P Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Apr; 86(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 373792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a new triphasic oral contraceptive in private practice. Ellsworth HS; Ayerst RI; Harris JW; Stone RA; Anderson AE; Jones TL; Curtis MK Contraception; 1986 Nov; 34(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 3102161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of metabolic and clinical effects of four oral contraceptive formulations and a contraceptive vaginal ring. Roy S; Mishell DR; Gray G; Dozono-Takano R; Brenner PF; Eide I; de Quattro V; Shaw ST Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Apr; 136(7):920-31. PubMed ID: 6767404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of contraceptive acceptability of levonorgestrel and ethinyl oestradiol administered in one three-phasic (Trionetta) and one monophasic (Neovletta) version. Carlborg L Contraception; 1983 May; 27(5):439-52. PubMed ID: 6349925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative profiles of reliability, cycle control and side effects of two oral contraceptive formulations containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and either 30 micrograms or 20 micrograms ethinyl oestradiol. Akerlund M; Røde A; Westergaard J Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Sep; 100(9):832-8. PubMed ID: 8218004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical experience with a triphasic oral contraceptive ('Trinordiol') in young women. Gaspard UJ; Deville JL; Dubois M Curr Med Res Opin; 1983; 8(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 6406157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lipid and biochemical changes after low-dose oral contraception. Loke DF; Ng CS; Holck S; Hall PE; Ratnam SS Contraception; 1992 Sep; 46(3):227-41. PubMed ID: 1451519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study on the efficacy and acceptability of two contraceptive pills administered by the vaginal route: an international multicenter clinical trial. Coutinho EM; de Souza JC; da Silva AR; de Acosta OM; Alvarez F; Brache V; Garza Flores J; Vasquez-Estrada L; Santo R; Bassol S Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1993 Jan; 53(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 8422744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Progestogen-only microdose followed by estrogen-progestogen combination, a new approach to oral contraception. Russowsky M; Sartoretto JN Contraception; 1982 Jul; 26(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 7128133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Control of fertility with oral medication. Diddle AW; Watts GF; Gardner WH; Williamson PJ West J Surg Obstet Gynecol; 1964; 72():222-9. PubMed ID: 12305556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of two low-dose combined oral contraceptives: results from a multicenter trial. Dunson TR; McLaurin VL; Israngkura B; Leelapattana B; Mukherjee R; Perez-Palacios G; Saleh AA Contraception; 1993 Aug; 48(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 8403908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of high-dose estrogens versus low-dose ethinylestradiol and norgestrel combination in postcoital interception: a study in 493 women. Van Santen MR; Haspels AA Fertil Steril; 1985 Feb; 43(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 3881294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicenter, comparative study of cycle control, efficacy and tolerability of two low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol/100 microg levonorgestrel and 20 microg ethinylestradiol/500 microg norethisterone. Endrikat J; Hite R; Bannemerschult R; Gerlinger C; Schmidt W Contraception; 2001 Jul; 64(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 11535206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multicenter, uncontrolled clinical investigation of the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and safety of a new low dose oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 100 micrograms levonorgestrel over six treatment cycles. Bannemerschult R; Hanker JP; Wünsch C; Fox P; Albring M; Brill K Contraception; 1997 Nov; 56(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 9437556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives, Minulet and Mercilon, in women over 30 years of age. Kirkman RJ; Pedersen JH; Fioretti P; Roberts HE Contraception; 1994 Jan; 49(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 8137624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]