These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6806740)
21. Professional Standards Review Organizations (PSROs). II. Developing professional standards review in dietetics. Hansen SG J Am Diet Assoc; 1974 Dec; 65(6):656-8. PubMed ID: 4475054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986. New benefits and burdens for physicians. Mickelsen RA Minn Med; 1987 Dec; 70(12):691-3. PubMed ID: 3696122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Occurrence screening can improve QA programs. Carlow D Dimens Health Serv; 1988 Jun; 65(5):20-2. PubMed ID: 3255632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I. Politser P Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Physicians and the PROs' third scope of work. Gosfield AG Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):1-10. PubMed ID: 10303854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Physician peer review in New Jersey. Dwyer WA N J Med; 1989 Feb; 86(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 2710420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Physicians peer review. Values and inadequacies in monitoring quality of care. Schutze SD Natl Med Leg J; 1994; 5(1):1, 6. PubMed ID: 8274572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Peer review in Virginia. Morton RA Va Med; 1986 Oct; 113(10):584-6. PubMed ID: 3788264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. What surgeons should know about peer review organizations and quality intervention plans. Stombler RE Bull Am Coll Surg; 1991 Feb; 76(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10109294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The evaluation of hospital medical staff performance--does health care review help? Barnes RH AHME J; 1976; 9(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 1035834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality assurance. PROs struggle to keep role in private Medicare plans. Gardner J Mod Healthc; 1997 Jun; 27(25):52. PubMed ID: 10167951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Peer review and you. Rhyne RH J Med Assoc State Ala; 1973 May; 42(11):767-8. PubMed ID: 4735406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Correcting the practice styles of errant physicians. Sharp JR Physician Exec; 1991; 17(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 10112654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A study of dentists perceptions of a QA project conducted in their private offices. Strauss RP; Lindahl RL; Barksdale MB QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Dec; 8(12):12-4. PubMed ID: 6818505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Peer review of HMOs is here--or is it? Kirchner M Med Econ; 1988 Oct; 65(19):99-101, 104-5. PubMed ID: 10288977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]