These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6808910)

  • 1. Agar disk diffusion for the quality control testing of Autobac elution disks.
    Gaydos JM; Harrington BJ
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Mar; 21(3):516-8. PubMed ID: 6808910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative quality control parameters for Autobac susceptibility testing disks: use of agar diffusion zone size results.
    Boshard R; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):814-7. PubMed ID: 6787073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wide variability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa aminoglycoside results among seven susceptibility testing procedures.
    Staneck JL; Glenn S; DiPersio JR; Leist PA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 27(10):2277-85. PubMed ID: 2511223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suitability of the ASM-2 standard test of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for evaluation of antimicrobial disk potency.
    Tardio JL; Westhoff D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 6432834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality control limits for the agar overlay disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility test.
    Barry AL; Badal RE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Dec; 16(6):1145-7. PubMed ID: 7161377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality control in antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing: a Belgian multicenter study.
    Lauwers S; Philippe J; Van Zeebroeck A; Pierard D; Derde MP; Kaufman L
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991 Aug; 10(8):652-6. PubMed ID: 1748119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-gentamicin discrepancies encountered in an Autobac I-disk diffusion comparison.
    Mayo JB; Kiehn TE; Wong B; Bernard EM; Armstrong D
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Mar; 21(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 6808909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Interlaboratory quality control of the agar diffusion test for determining sensitivity of microorganisms to antibiotics].
    Garanina EN; Givental' NI; Andreeva ZM; Verenchikova IaV; Ginzburg AI
    Lab Delo; 1984; (1):43-6. PubMed ID: 6199568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facilitating quality control of the antimicrobial susceptibility test.
    Fluornoy DJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):231-2. PubMed ID: 6780602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality control of agar diffusion susceptibility tests. Data from the Quality Assurance Service Microbiology Program of the College of American Pathologists.
    Knowles RC; Moore TD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Oct; 74(4 Suppl):581-5. PubMed ID: 6776805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.
    Thornsberry C; Gavan TL; Sherris JC; Balows A; Matsen JM; Sabath LD; Schoenknecht F; Thrupp LD; Washington JA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1975 Apr; 7(4):466-80. PubMed ID: 1147582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility test results: how guilty a laboratory could be?
    Nassar MSM; Hazzah WA; Bakr WMK
    J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 2019; 94(1):4. PubMed ID: 30686832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cefoperazone disk diffusion susceptibility test: confirmation of the tentative interpretive criteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-resistance, and determination of quality control performance limits.
    Jones RN; Gavan TL; Barry AL; Thornsberry C; Gibbs DL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):777-86. PubMed ID: 6212596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of two standardized disk methods for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and of the Enterobacteriaceae.
    Barry AL; Effinger LJ
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1974 Oct; 6(4):452-9. PubMed ID: 4157344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Australian evaluation of Autobac I with suggested interpretive and technical modifications.
    Funnell GR; Guinness MD
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Sep; 16(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 389157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of serial plate agar dilution, Bauer-Kirby disk diffusion, and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for the determination of susceptibilities of Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ten antimicrobial agents.
    Fekete T; Tumah H; Woodwell J; Truant A; Satishchandran V; Axelrod P; Kreter B
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Apr; 18(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 7924222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Susceptibility testing quality control studies with fosfomycin tromethamine.
    Fuchs PC; Barry AL; Brown SD
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Jul; 16(7):538-40. PubMed ID: 9272392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpretive standards and quality control guidelines for imipenem susceptibility tests with 10-micrograms disks.
    Barry AL; Thornsberry C; Gavan TL; Jones RN
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):988-9. PubMed ID: 6439736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison and evaluation of carbenicillin disks in diffusion susceptibility testing.
    Matsen JM; Lund ME; Brooker DC
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1974 Jun; 5(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 15825412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility testing by an automated system, Autobac I.
    Cleary TJ; Maurer D
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 May; 13(5):837-41. PubMed ID: 248270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.