These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6808955)
1. [Hemodynamic evaluation of mitral and aortic bioprosthesis. Apropos of 27 Carpentier-Edwards and 7 hancock (standard model) prostheses]. Leroy G; Lelguen C; Juillard A; d'Auzac C; Fernandez F; Gerbaux A Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1982 Apr; 75(4):459-67. PubMed ID: 6808955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemodynamic evaluation of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses. Levine FH; Carter JE; Buckley MJ; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG Circulation; 1981 Aug; 64(2 Pt 2):II192-5. PubMed ID: 7249322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: mid-term clinical results. Meyns B; Szecsi J; Flameng W; Daenen W J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 8162219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results. Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Hemodynamic results of replacing the mitral valve with an aortic xenobioprosthesis]. Fursov BA; Barbarash LS; Bogomolova MP; Bykova VA; Popov VV Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 1986 Feb; 136(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 3705335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hemodynamic and clinical comparison of the Hancock modified orifice and standard orifice bioprostheses in the aortic position. Rossiter SJ; Miller DC; Stinson EB; Oyer PE; Reitz BA; Moreno-Cabral RJ; Mace JG; Robert EW; Tsagaris TJ; Sutton RB; Alderman EL; Shumway NE J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Jul; 80(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 7382536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses. Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis. David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic function of the Hancock standard orifice aortic valve bioprosthesis. Borkon AM; McIntosh CL; Jones M; Lipson LC; Kent KM; Morrow AG J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Oct; 82(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 7278353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the aortic intact porcine bioprosthesis. Mullany CJ; Schaff HV; Orszulak TA; Miller FA J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 8000607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Five year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine heterograft cardiac valve]. Nishida H; Sawatari K; Nishiya Y; Nakagawa T; Fujimura M; Maeda S; Oshiro Y; Ishikawa T; Kasuno K Kyobu Geka; 1983 Apr; 36(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 6865133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Hemodynamic evaluation of the Biocor heterologous prosthesis]. Barbosa MR; Azevedo Sobrinho AL; Vrandecic MO; Chaves JC; Amaral JJ; de Mendonça JV; Miari R Arq Bras Cardiol; 1984 Feb; 42(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6477179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemodynamic evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Rothkopf M; Davidson T; Lipscomb K; Narahara K; Hillis LD; Willerson JT; Estrera A; Platt M; Mills L Am J Cardiol; 1979 Aug; 44(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 463445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Omnicarbon tilting-disc heart valve prosthesis. A clinical and Doppler echocardiographic follow-up. Peter M; Weiss P; Jenzer HR; Hoffmann A; Dubach P; Roth J; Bertschmann W; Stulz P; Grädel E; Burckhardt D J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Oct; 106(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 8412252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]