These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6810978)
1. The evaluation of Professional Standards Review Organizations: their part in the struggle to assure appropriate health care. Davis FA Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 6810978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. PSRO: an evaluation of the Professional Standards Review Organization. J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(3):87-9. PubMed ID: 10308911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. PSROs: their current status and their impact to date. Dobson A; Greer JG; Carlson RH; Davis FA; Kucken LE; Steinhardt BJ; Ferry TP; Adler GS Inquiry; 1978 Jun; 15(2):113-28. PubMed ID: 149760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. PSRO performance: the 1977 and 1978 evaluations of Professional Standards Review Organizations. Goldstein RL; Stanton B; Burwell L QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1979 Oct; 5(10):3-7. PubMed ID: 121385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Utilization management as a cost-containment strategy. Bailit HL; Sennett C Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl; 1991; ():87-93. PubMed ID: 10117120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of Medicare hospital utilization trends for long term home health care. Kelly JT; Shea MA; Ross JE Pride Inst J Long Term Home Health Care; 1987; 6(2):14-7. PubMed ID: 10301751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between the Professional Standards Review Organizations and the State Health Department. McGarvey MR Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 7052175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Professional Standards Review Organization program. Nelson AR Conn Med; 1981 Jan; 45(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 6785004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. HCFA official outlines PRO program objectives. Morford T Hospitals; 1987 Aug; 61(15):122. PubMed ID: 3596537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The OPEL study intent and content. Dobson A; Davis F QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1978 Oct; 4(10):19-23. PubMed ID: 104222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. PRO-hospital contracts: the last chance to ease burden of reviews. O'Hare PK; Collier G Mod Healthc; 1984 Oct; 14(13):54-8. PubMed ID: 10299720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of PROs on hospitals and pharmacy practice. Black BL Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jan; 44(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3548342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspectives. Cops or colleagues? Fuzzy standards for judging PROs. Cunningham R Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1996 May; 50(20):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10156158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Utilization review in the United States: results from a 1976-1977 national survey of hospitals. Gertman PM; Monheit AC; Anderson JJ; Eagle JB; Levenson DK Med Care; 1979 Aug; 17(8 Suppl):i-iii, 1-148. PubMed ID: 381795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health care regulation via PSRO: the management control system of concurrent stay review. Dittman DA Socioecon Issues Health; 1980; ():39-57. PubMed ID: 10309697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. PRO program to focus efforts on two objectives. Morford TG QA Rev; 1990 May; 2(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 10113752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of the cost effectiveness and quality of hospital treatment: the American Medicare Peer Review Organization model]. Kersting T; Eichhorn S Chirurg; 1994 Nov; 65(11):suppl 235-41. PubMed ID: 7821056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. PROs in transition. Bomberger I Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):22-4. PubMed ID: 10278605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicare utilization in the United States: PSRO and regional impacts. Rothberg DL; Pinto J; Gertman PM Health Serv Res; 1980; 15(3):249-70. PubMed ID: 7009497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]