These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6814829)

  • 21. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
    Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
    Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reinforcement of denture acrylic resin: the effect of metal inserts and denture resin type on fracture resistance.
    Polyzois GL
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):275-8. PubMed ID: 8603172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dimensional stability of two visible light-cured indirect inlay/onlay resin composite materials.
    Lynde TA; Schulman LB; Meiers JC; Whitehill JM
    Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):153-6. PubMed ID: 9002790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Adhesive strength studies of Isopast on Palliag M in a stress test after various metal surface pretreatment].
    Kühl W; Renk A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1982 Dec; 37(12):961-3. PubMed ID: 6961020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro evaluation of the effect of thermal and mechanical fatigues on the bonding of an autopolymerizing soft denture liner to denture base materials using different primers.
    Minami H; Suzuki S; Minesaki Y; Kurashige H; Tanaka T
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 18355165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative assessment of light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin adhesives: in vitro study of a new adhesive system.
    Newman GV; Newman RA; Sengupta AK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 11244420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A method for considerable improvement of the filling adhesion to the enamel of front teeth].
    Moller ML
    Tandlaegebladet; 1972 Dec; 76(12):1195-7. PubMed ID: 4511195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical guidelines for indirect resin restorations.
    Shannon A
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1997 Jun; 63(6):432-7. PubMed ID: 9203775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The British contribution to recent advances in dental materials.
    Combe EC
    Br Dent J; 1969 Oct; 127(8):355-8. PubMed ID: 5260554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Study on effect of sealing of the pit and fissure with resin adhesive: condition of the sealed material after tensile destruction.
    Eto M
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1970 May; 11(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 5268305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Adhesive resins to hard tissues].
    Nakabayashi N
    Shikai Tenbo; 1983 Sep; 62(3):589-92. PubMed ID: 6582617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Porcelain inlays cemented with composite resin cement: an in vivo investigation of pulpal reaction one year following cementation.
    Vigolo P; Graiff L; Mutinelli S; Fonzi F
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 17362422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of dentin adhesive and cure mode on film thickness and microtensile bond strength to dentin in indirect restorations.
    Coelho Santos MJ; Navarro MF; Tam L; McComb D
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 15765957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional quantification of adhesive remnants on teeth after debonding.
    Lee YK; Lim YK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):556-62. PubMed ID: 18929274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fibre reinforcement enhances bonding of soft lining to acrylic dental and maxillofacial prostheses.
    Hatamleh MM; Watts DC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Sep; 16(3):116-21. PubMed ID: 19051553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparative study of the retention of two bridge retainers: cemented partial crowns versus adhesive resin-bonded inlays.
    Posti JJ; Näkki K; Siirilä HS
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1980; 76(5-6):258-61. PubMed ID: 7019902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.