These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 681625)

  • 21. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal coordination between actions and sound during sequence production.
    Pfordresher PQ; Benitez B
    Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Oct; 26(5):742-56. PubMed ID: 17764772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing.
    Desmet JB; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Lambrechts P; Hol MK; Mylanus EA; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 23615167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Some characteristics of amplified music through hearing aids.
    Chasin M; Hockley NS
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():2-12. PubMed ID: 23880110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise.
    Gustafsson HA; Arlinger SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):518-29. PubMed ID: 8120263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Personal music systems and hearing.
    Kumar UA; Deepashree SR
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Aug; 130(8):717-29. PubMed ID: 27221308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of aided hearing in the nonimplanted ear on bimodal hearing.
    Jang JH; Lee JH; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):e270-6. PubMed ID: 25153664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.
    Weiss R; Leinung M; Baumann U; Weißgerber T; Rader T; Stöver T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2107-2115. PubMed ID: 28032241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of auditory and visual interference on speech and sign.
    Siegel GM; Clay JL; Naeve SL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 35(6):1358-62. PubMed ID: 1494277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hemispheric difference in activation patterns of human auditory-associated cortex: an FMRI study.
    Hwang JH; Wu CW; Chou PH; Liu TC; Chen JH
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2005; 67(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 16276121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus on speech recognition over air and bone conduction military communications headsets.
    Manning C; Mermagen T; Scharine A
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():67-75. PubMed ID: 27989949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Output capabilities of personal music players and assessment of preferred listening levels of test subjects: outlining recommendations for preventing music-induced hearing loss.
    Breinbauer HA; Anabalón JL; Gutierrez D; Cárcamo R; Olivares C; Caro J
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Nov; 122(11):2549-56. PubMed ID: 23060148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Early clinical results: SOUNDTEC implantable hearing device phase II study.
    Hough JV; Dyer RK; Matthews P; Wood MW
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11192875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.