These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6816333)

  • 1. Assessment of the accuracy and role of self-recorded blood pressures in the management of hypertension.
    Gould BA; Kieso HA; Hornung R; Altman DG; Cashman PM; Raftery EB
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1982 Dec; 285(6356):1691-4. PubMed ID: 6816333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Home blood pressure readings in clinical hypertension research.
    Schmidt GR; Pitterle ME; Schuna AA
    Clin Pharm; 1986 Nov; 5(11):917-20. PubMed ID: 3536268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Home blood pressure readings in borderline hypertensive patients.
    Santilli GM; English JC
    Fam Pract Res J; 1990; 10(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 2288240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reproducibility of average ambulatory, home, and clinic pressures.
    James GD; Pickering TG; Yee LS; Harshfield GA; Riva S; Laragh JH
    Hypertension; 1988 Jun; 11(6 Pt 1):545-9. PubMed ID: 3384470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of recorded home blood pressure measurements on the staging of hypertensive patients.
    Jain A; Krakoff LR
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Jun; 7(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 12131072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changing relation between home and clinic blood-pressure measurements: do home measurements predict clinic hypertension?
    Padfield PL; Lindsay BA; McLaren JA; Pirie A; Rademaker M
    Lancet; 1987 Aug; 2(8554):322-4. PubMed ID: 2886776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some implications of the differences between home, clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive patients.
    Pickering TG; James GD
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1989 May; 7(3):S65-72. PubMed ID: 2668466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the Avionics Pressurometer III 1978 at home and in hospital.
    Gould BA; Hornung RS; Cashman PM; Altman D; Raftery EB
    Clin Cardiol; 1986 Jul; 9(7):335-43. PubMed ID: 3731558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Home blood pressure: variability, comparison with office readings and proposal for reference values. Groupe de la Mesure, French Society of Hypertension.
    de Gaudemaris R; Chau NP; Mallion JM
    J Hypertens; 1994 Jul; 12(7):831-8. PubMed ID: 7963513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability of indirect methods used to determine blood pressure. Office vs mean 24-hour automated blood pressures.
    Bottini PB; Carr AA; Rhoades RB; Prisant LM
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Jan; 152(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 1728909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blood pressure self-measurement in normotensive and hypertensive patients.
    Bättig B; Steiner A; Jeck T; Vetter W
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1989 May; 7(3):S59-63. PubMed ID: 2760717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of self-measured home vs. clinic intra-arterial blood pressure.
    Kjeldsen SE; Moan A; Petrin J; Weder AB; Zweifler AJ; Julius S
    Blood Press; 1993 Mar; 2(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 8193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of office, home and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures in borderline and mild hypertension.
    Bialy GB; Ruddy MC; Malka ES; Silvay LA; Kamalakannan N
    Angiology; 1988 Aug; 39(8):752-60. PubMed ID: 3421509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of office and serial automatic blood pressure readings in renovascular and essential hypertension.
    Vreugdenhil G; Schrey G; de Leeuw PW
    J Hum Hypertens; 1992 Jun; 6(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 1629887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous recording of direct arterial pressure in unrestricted patients. Its role in the diagnosis and management of high blood pressure.
    Littler WA; Honour AJ; Pugsley DJ; Sleight P
    Circulation; 1975 Jun; 51(6):1101-6. PubMed ID: 1132100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of self-recorded blood pressure during drug trials.
    Gould BA; Hornung RS; Kieso H; Cashman PM; Raftery EB
    Hypertension; 1986 Apr; 8(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 3514446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 24-hour blood pressure monitoring: evaluation of Spacelabs 5300 monitor by comparison with intra-arterial blood pressure recording in ambulant subjects.
    Casadei R; Parati G; Pomidossi G; Groppelli A; Trazzi S; Di Rienzo M; Mancia G
    J Hypertens; 1988 Oct; 6(10):797-803. PubMed ID: 3198917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Indirect measurement of blood pressure during exercise testing can be misleading.
    Gould BA; Hornung RS; Altman DG; Cashman PM; Raftery EB
    Br Heart J; 1985 Jun; 53(6):611-5. PubMed ID: 4005083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of performance of various sphygmomanometers with intra-arterial blood-pressure readings.
    Hunyor SN; Flynn JM; Cochineas C
    Br Med J; 1978 Jul; 2(6131):159-62. PubMed ID: 678830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical utility of blood pressure readings obtained by self-determination.
    Mejia A; Julius S
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1989 May; 7(3):S53-7. PubMed ID: 2668465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.