These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6817254)

  • 1. A physician's perspective on proper design of quality assessment criteria.
    Merry MD
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Oct; 8(10):3-4. PubMed ID: 6817254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating health plan quality 2: survey design principles for measuring health plan quality.
    Wholey DR; Christianson JB; Finch M; Knutson D; Rockwood T; Warrick L;
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jun; 9 Spec No 2():SP65-75. PubMed ID: 12822716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating health plan quality 1: a conceptual model.
    Wholey DR; Christianson JB; Finch M; Knutson D; Rockwood T; Warrick L;
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jun; 9 Spec No 2():SP53-64. PubMed ID: 12822715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Private review-its impact on health care and physicians.
    Sandrick KM
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Apr; 8(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 6806740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physicians' involvement is a key ingredient in peer review program.
    Hyden JP
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1982; 15(6):37-8. PubMed ID: 10257058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Provider profiling: doing it right.
    Diamond LH
    Healthplan; 2000; 41(3):74-5, 78-82. PubMed ID: 11066253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating health plan quality 3: survey measurement properties.
    Wholey DR; Finch M; Christianson JB; Knutson D; Rockwood T; Warrick L;
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jun; 9 Spec No 2():SP76-87. PubMed ID: 12822717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correcting the practice styles of errant physicians.
    Sharp JR
    Physician Exec; 1991; 17(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 10112654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sham peer review: perversions of a powerful process.
    Pfifferling JH; Meyer DN; Wang CJ
    Physician Exec; 2008; 34(5):24-9. PubMed ID: 19456073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance as an information system for an era of increasing accountability.
    Desch JR
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Dec; 10(2):33-44. PubMed ID: 10296241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Further development of peer-review-procedures in medical rehabilitation].
    Farin E; Carl C; Jäckel WH; Rütten-Köppel E; Maier-Riehle B; Berghaus U
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Jun; 43(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 15202040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The limits of medical quality assurance systems.
    Burton RM
    Physician Exec; 1992; 18(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 10118409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occurrence screening can improve QA programs.
    Carlow D
    Dimens Health Serv; 1988 Jun; 65(5):20-2. PubMed ID: 3255632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assessment: a current perspective.
    Jones FG
    J S C Med Assoc; 1988 Oct; 84(10):501-5. PubMed ID: 3184873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Defaming a physician's career. The double edged sword of peer review privilege and immunity.
    Hwang NH
    J Leg Med; 2004 Mar; 25(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 15204916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of physician performance.
    N Engl J Med; 1980 Nov; 303(20):1182-3. PubMed ID: 7421942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reviewer status and review quality. Experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation.
    Stossel TP
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(10):658-9. PubMed ID: 3974642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review: central specialist committee statement.
    McKean WI
    N Z Med J; 1983 Mar; 96(728):214-5. PubMed ID: 6572827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review--the newcomers' perspective.
    Mainguy G; Motamedi MR; Mietchen D
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Sep; 3(9):e326. PubMed ID: 16149851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploding 12 myths about quality assurance and peer review.
    Thompson RE
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):39-49. PubMed ID: 10290183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.