110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6819519)
21. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
Savell JF; Toothman EH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Innovative field practices in hearing conservation.
Witt B
Occup Health Saf; 2006 Oct; 75(10):116, 118-9, 172. PubMed ID: 17059061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Noise-induced hearing loss.
Catlin FI
Am J Otol; 1986 Mar; 7(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 2938482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Industrial hearing conservation.
Glorig A
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):609-21. PubMed ID: 471506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Engineering measures can muffle hazards heard in noisy work areas.
Rekus JF
Occup Health Saf; 1993 Sep; 62(9):82-9. PubMed ID: 8414376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Audiometric evaluation of noise induced hearing loss.
Ruth RA
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):639-54. PubMed ID: 471510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using audiometric data base analysis.
Royster JD; Royster LH
J Occup Med; 1986 Oct; 28(10):1055-68. PubMed ID: 3772540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An evaluation of the effectiveness of two different insert types of ear protection in preventing TTS in an industrial environment.
Royster LH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Mar; 41(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 7395724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of improved hearing protection regulations in the prevention of military noise-induced hearing loss.
Mrena R; Ylikoski J; Kiukaanniemi H; Mäkitie AA; Savolainen S
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 128(9):997-1003. PubMed ID: 19086196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Recommended criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs.
Royster LH; Lilley DT; Thomas WG
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Jan; 41(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 7355721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The practical side of hearing conservation.
Nelson RA
Int J Occup Health Saf; 1975; 44(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 1132933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Hearing conservation: implementing and evaluating a program.
Harrison RK
AAOHN J; 1989 Apr; 37(4):107-11. PubMed ID: 2518840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Otology and industrial hearing conservation.
Sataloff J
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1975; 84(4 Pt 1):527-9. PubMed ID: 1155887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Criteria for the further employment of persons with hearing damage in noise areas (author's transl)].
Baldus S
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Oct; 60(10):505-11. PubMed ID: 7345276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Role of continuous monitoring in a hearing conservation program.
Michael K; Tougaw E; Wilkinson R
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):195-9. PubMed ID: 21368445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Hearing protection works!
Rink TL
Occup Health Saf; 1996 Oct; 65(10):58-64. PubMed ID: 8865670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Otologic annotations to VDI rule 2058].
Partsch CJ; Schöndorf J
Zentralbl Arbeitsmed; 1971 Oct; 21(10):328-9. PubMed ID: 5159740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Relative ear protector performance in high vs low sound levels.
Thunder TD; Lankford JE
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1023-9. PubMed ID: 539542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. NHCA conference highlights top hearing conservation trends.
Schulz TY
Occup Health Saf; 2013 Jun; 82(6):18, 20. PubMed ID: 23858684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Protect those ears before it is your loss.
Rajotte C
Kans Nurse; 1997 Aug; 72(7):3. PubMed ID: 9355494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
