These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 682026)

  • 1. Performance evaluations of recent wide field scintillation gamma cameras.
    Lim CB; Hoffer PB; Rollo FD; Lilien DL
    J Nucl Med; 1978 Aug; 19(8):942-7. PubMed ID: 682026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thallium-201: scintillation camera imaging considerations.
    Groch MW; Lewis GK
    J Nucl Med; 1976 Feb; 17(02):142-5. PubMed ID: 1245877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of a PSPMT based detector for scintimammography.
    Williams MB; Williams MB; Goode AR; Galbis-Reig V; Majewski S; Weisenberger AG; Wojcik R
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 45(3):781-800. PubMed ID: 10730971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A field procedure for the quantitative assessment of nuclear imaging cameras.
    Lewellen TK; Williams DL; Murano R; Hamilton GW; Nelp WB
    J Nucl Med; 1978 Aug; 19(8):954-8. PubMed ID: 682029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of photon energy on tests of field uniformity in scintillation cameras: concise communication.
    Lewis JT; Neff RA; Nishiyama H; Bahr GH
    J Nucl Med; 1978 May; 19(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 641580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of asymmetric photopeak windows on flood field uniformity and spatial resolution of scintillation cameras.
    Graham LS; LaFontaine RL; Stein MA
    J Nucl Med; 1986 May; 27(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 3712085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Front-illuminated versus back-illuminated photon-counting CCD-based gamma camera: important consequences for spatial resolution and energy resolution.
    Heemskerk JW; Westra AH; Linotte PM; Ligtvoet KM; Zbijewski W; Beekman FJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):N149-62. PubMed ID: 17404450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new nuclear medicine scintillation camera based on image-intensifier tubes.
    Mulder H; Pauwels EK
    J Nucl Med; 1976 Nov; 17(11):1008-12. PubMed ID: 978249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid evaluation of weekly scintillation camera resolution and linearity using the orthogonal tri-hole phantom.
    Smith EM; Hopkins KT
    J Nucl Med Technol; 1999 Mar; 27(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 10322571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical significance of scintillation camera electronics capable of high processing rates.
    Murphy P; Arseneau R; Maxon E; Thompson W
    J Nucl Med; 1977 Feb; 18(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 833663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo simulations of compact gamma cameras based on avalanche photodiodes.
    Després P; Funk T; Shah KS; Hasegawa BH
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3057-74. PubMed ID: 17505089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correction for field nonuniformity in scintillation cameras through removal of spastial distortion.
    Muehllehner G; Colsher JG; Stoub EW
    J Nucl Med; 1980 Aug; 21(8):771-6. PubMed ID: 7400833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance evaluation of the GE healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner.
    Wang Y; Seidel J; Tsui BM; Vaquero JJ; Pomper MG
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1891-900. PubMed ID: 17079824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative assessment of scintillation camera performance.
    Moretti JL; Mensch B; Guey A; Desgrez A
    Radiology; 1976 Apr; 119(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 1257436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mobile gamma cameras: a comparative evaluation.
    Royal HD; Brown PH; Claunch BC
    Radiology; 1978 Jul; 128(1):229-34. PubMed ID: 663215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Validation of the imagamma interface for connecting gamma cameras to personal computers].
    Borrón M; Morales J; Rodríguez M; González J; Alcaina J
    Rev Esp Med Nucl; 1998; 17(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9609837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A micro-machined retro-reflector for improving light yield in ultra-high-resolution gamma cameras.
    Heemskerk JW; Korevaar MA; Kreuger R; Ligtvoet CM; Schotanus P; Beekman FJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(10):3003-14. PubMed ID: 19387099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a clinical scintillation camera with pulse tail extrapolation electronics.
    Lewellen TK; Bice AN; Pollard KR; Zhu JB; Plunkett ME
    J Nucl Med; 1989 Sep; 30(9):1554-8. PubMed ID: 2769408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality control of scintillation cameras using a minicomputer.
    Hasegawa BH; Kirch DL; LeFree MT; Vogel RA; Steele PP; Hendee WR
    J Nucl Med; 1981 Dec; 22(12):1075-80. PubMed ID: 7310516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phantom study of a new hand-held γ-imaging probe for radio-guided surgery.
    Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Marcolongo A; Rubello D
    Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Jan; 34(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 23103999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.