These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6822042)

  • 1. Femoral artery flow and pain during lumbar aortography: comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media.
    Padayachee TS; Reidy JF; King DH; Reeves M; Gosling RG
    Clin Radiol; 1983 Jan; 34(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 6822042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of iopamidol and diatrizoate in peripheral angiography.
    Fletcher EW
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Jan; 55(649):36-8. PubMed ID: 7032637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in left ventricular diastolic function after left ventriculography: a comparison with iopamidol and urografin.
    Tani M; Handa S; Noma S; Kojima S; Miyamori R; Miyazaki T; Yoshino H; Ohnishi S; Yamazaki H; Nakamura Y
    Am Heart J; 1985 Sep; 110(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 4036787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of two non-ionic contrast media, iopamidol and metrizamide, in translumbar aortography.
    Hacking PM; Soppitt D
    Clin Radiol; 1983 Jan; 34(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 6337005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of histamine release effects of ionic and non-ionic radiographic contrast media.
    Salem DN; Findlay SR; Isner JM; Konstam MA; Cohen PF
    Am J Med; 1986 Mar; 80(3):382-4. PubMed ID: 2420176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of prostaglandin inhibition on the renal vascular response to ionic and non-ionic contrast media in the dog.
    Lund G; Einzig S; Rysavy J; Salomonowitz E; Castaneda-Zuniga W; Amplatz K
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(5):407-10. PubMed ID: 6507135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative neurotoxicity of angiographic contrast media.
    Velaj R; Drayer B; Albright R; Fram E
    Neurology; 1985 Sep; 35(9):1290-8. PubMed ID: 3927186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of contrast media osmolality on isolated rabbit heart performance.
    Bongrani S; Baldi G; Cucchini F; di Donato M; Visioli O
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1979; 20(5):769-78. PubMed ID: 93401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical cardiovascular experiences with iopamidol: a new non-ionic contrast medium.
    Partridge JB; Robinson PJ; Turnbull CM; Stoker JB; Boyle RM; Morrison GW
    Clin Radiol; 1981 Jul; 32(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 6972848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iopamidol, a new nonionic contrast medium in peripheral angiography.
    Kallehauge HE; Praestholm J
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1982; 5(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 6762926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iopamidol and meglumine diatrizoate: comparison of effects on patient discomfort during aortofemoral arteriography.
    Widrich WC; Beckman CF; Robbins AH; Scholz FJ; Srinivasan MK; Hayes EJ; Kellum CD; Newman T
    Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 6344138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Different effect of diatrizoate and iopamidol on prostaglandin synthesis in perfused hamster lungs.
    Paajanen H; Uotila P; Kormano M
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 6413449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison of Hexabrix, iopamidol, and Urografin-60 in whole body computed tomography.
    Spataro RF; Fischer HW; Kormano M
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S372-5. PubMed ID: 6511276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pain and aortofemoral arteriography: the importance of chemical structure and osmolality of contrast agents.
    Holder JC; Dalrymple GV
    Invest Radiol; 1981; 16(6):508-12. PubMed ID: 7319758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pulmonary angiography with iopamidol and Renografin 76 in normal and pulmonary hypertensive dogs.
    Thompson WM; Mills SR; Bates M; Hedlund L; Rommel J
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1983; 24(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 6666667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cardiac complications of intravenous digital angiography. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media].
    Stacul F; Marass P; Pozzi Mucelli R; Predonzan F; Magnaldi S; Abbona M
    Radiol Med; 1985; 71(1-2):40-3. PubMed ID: 4023305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A controlled clinical trial of iohexol and diatrizoate in aortofemoral angiography.
    Egsgaard H; Hørup A; Praestholm J
    Eur J Radiol; 1983 Feb; 3(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 6341063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iopamidol arteriography: discomfort and pain.
    Dotter CT; Rösch J; Erlandson M; Buschman RW; Ogilvie R
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):819-21. PubMed ID: 3890014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Left ventriculography and coronary angiography with a new non-ionic contrast medium. Hemodynamic, metabolic and electrocardiographic study in comparison with a commonly used contrast medium (author's transl)].
    Cucchini F; Di Donato M; Baldi G; Effendy FN; Bongrani S; Colla B; Visioli O
    G Ital Cardiol; 1979; 9(7):744-52. PubMed ID: 540705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Excretory urography--current indications of the status of a conventional diagnostic method. Status of nonionic and ionic contrast media].
    Porst H; Mayer R
    Fortschr Med; 1985 Aug; 103(30):755-8. PubMed ID: 4043912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.