133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6823191)
1. Bioactive glass ceramic: a new material in tympanoplasty.
Reck R
Laryngoscope; 1983 Feb; 93(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 6823191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioactive glass-ceramics in ear surgery: animal studies and clinical results.
Reck R
Laryngoscope; 1984 Feb; 94(2 Pt 2 Suppl 33):1-54. PubMed ID: 6363847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tissue reactions to glass ceramics in the middle ear.
Reck R
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1981 Feb; 6(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 7273453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The bioactive glass ceramic Ceravital in ear surgery. Five years' experience.
Reck R; Helms J
Am J Otol; 1985 May; 6(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 4003541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Materials for reconstruction of the middle ear].
Geyer G
HNO; 1999 Feb; 47(2):77-91. PubMed ID: 10197273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bioactive glass ceramic in ossicular reconstruction: a preliminary report.
Niparko JK; Kemink JL; Graham MD; Kartush JM
Laryngoscope; 1988 Aug; 98(8 Pt 1):822-5. PubMed ID: 3398655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reconstruction of the posterior wall of the auditory canal with Ceravital prostheses].
Reck R
HNO; 1985 Apr; 33(4):162-5. PubMed ID: 3997577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Our experience with ossicular prostheses of Ceravital].
Gersdorff M
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1985; 106(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 3834549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [5 years of clinical experience with Ceravital prostheses in the middle ear].
Reck R
HNO; 1985 Apr; 33(4):166-70. PubMed ID: 3997578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioactive glass-ceramics in middle ear surgery. An 8-year review.
Reck R; Störkel S; Meyer A
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1988; 523():100-6. PubMed ID: 3382120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ceramic implants in otologic surgery.
Plester D; Jahnke K
Am J Otol; 1981 Oct; 3(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 7304719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tympanoplasty with bio-inert and bio-active ceramics.
Jahnke K
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1985; 106(5):339-42. PubMed ID: 3834551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Methods of ossicular reconstruction.
Jansen C
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1972 Feb; 5(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 4551419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Solving ossicular problems in tympanoplasty.
Schuring AG; Lippy WH
Laryngoscope; 1983 Sep; 93(9):1151-4. PubMed ID: 6888126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tympanoplasty and ossicular reconstruction: the last four years.
Crabtree JA
Am J Otol; 1982 Oct; 4(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 6756160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with Proplast.
Shea JJ; Malenbaum BT; Moretz WH
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1984 Jun; 92(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 6431374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reconstruction of the middle ear with hydroxylapatite implants: long-term results.
Grote JJ
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1990 Feb; 144():12-6. PubMed ID: 2154156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Secondary neotympanic membrane and total ossicular chain reconstruction. A preliminary report.
Misurya VK; Kirtane MV; Gutpa KR; Shrivastava PK; Varshney P
Arch Otolaryngol; 1980 Sep; 106(9):557-9. PubMed ID: 7406760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Compatibility of glass-carbon implants in the middle ear--animal experiment studies].
Krummel FJ; Reck R; Meyer A
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1987 Aug; 66(8):409-11. PubMed ID: 3312880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioactive ceramics versus proplast implants in ossiculoplasty.
Babighian G
Am J Otol; 1985 Jul; 6(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 3839631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
