96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6823995)
1. Time and cost comparison of four methods of filling piggyback bottles.
Pohorylo EM; Lewis EM; Anderson ER
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Jan; 40(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 6823995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Time and cost comparison of four methods of filling drug manufacturers' piggyback bottles.
Anderson ER; Soares MS
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1985 May; 42(5):1083-6. PubMed ID: 4003420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and efficiency of three methods of preparing piggyback admixtures.
Fraterrigo CC; Jorgenson JA
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1982 Nov; 39(11):1920-3. PubMed ID: 7148860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of six methods for preparing cefazolin sodium for intermittent injection.
Markowsky SJ; Kitrenos JG
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Oct; 40(10):1653-8. PubMed ID: 6638027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of six methods of preparing piggyback doses of cephalothin sodium.
Dreiman RK
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Oct; 37(10):1342-6. PubMed ID: 7424931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost comparison of two systems for intermittent intravenous administration of small-volume injections.
Reilly RT; Strand LM; Bair JN
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1985 Feb; 42(2):323-8. PubMed ID: 3976678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of automated and manual methods of syringe filling.
Achusim LE; Woller TW; Somani SM; Abramowitz PW
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Nov; 47(11):2492-5. PubMed ID: 2278261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of seven methods of preparing and administering cefazolin sodium small-volume injections.
Smith TF; Kitrenos JG
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Aug; 43(8):1930-5. PubMed ID: 3752132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unit-of-use versus traditional intravenous piggyback drug administration systems.
Tribble DA; Fotis M; McDonald DE
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1979 Jun; 36(6):739, 742. PubMed ID: 111545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Contamination rates and costs associated with the use of four intermittent intravenous infusion systems.
Paxinos J; Hammel RJ; Fritz WL
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1979 Nov; 36(11):1497-503. PubMed ID: 517535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Recycled unused piggyback admixtures through the use of tamper-proof safety caps.
Jennings RH; Schad RF; Kaurich J
Hosp Pharm; 1982 Dec; 17(12):643-5, 652. PubMed ID: 10257924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new batch method of preparing intravenous piggyback solutions in polyvinylchloride containers.
Levy R; Kleinberg M; Lee P
Hosp Pharm; 1980 Oct; 15(10):504-6. PubMed ID: 10309298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of methods and costs of preparing intravenous piggyback solutions.
Grey C
Hosp Pharm; 1976 Jun; 11(6):214, 18, 21-2. PubMed ID: 1026705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Economic assessment of different administration modes for total parenteral nutrition].
Achach K; Peroux E; Hébuterne X
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2002; 26(8-9):680-5. PubMed ID: 12434068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience with the large-scale use of surface-treated infusion bottles.
Regös E; Horváth K
Ann Immunol Hung; 1973; 17():269-72. PubMed ID: 4805812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel subdermal implants. Comparison with other contraceptive methods available in the United States.
Ashraf T; Arnold SB; Maxfield M
J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):791-8. PubMed ID: 7837126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cost-benefit analysis of a semi-automated process in the preparation of unit-doses by the Pharmacy Department].
Poveda Andrés JL; Hernández Sansalvador M; Díez Martínez AM; García Gómez C
Farm Hosp; 2004; 28(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 15101798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of photometric cyanmethemoglobin and automated methods for hemoglobin estimation.
Azim W; Parveen S; Parveen S
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2002; 14(3):22-3. PubMed ID: 12476859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Optimizing microbiological controls of corneal organ culture media].
Thuret G; Carricajo A; Chiquet C; Vautrin AC; Boureille M; Acquart S; Aubert G; Maugery J; Gain P
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2003 Oct; 26(8):792-800. PubMed ID: 14586219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the pump syringe method with other methods for adding potassium chloride to Travenol large-volume parenterals.
Moeller KA; Clyne KE
Hosp Pharm; 1980 Dec; 15(12):605-7. PubMed ID: 10249421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
