These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Legal issues in mental health administration. Mills MJ; Cummins BD; Gracey JS Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 6642825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuing case law development in the right to refuse treatment. Mills MJ; Yesavage JA; Gutheil TG Am J Psychiatry; 1983 Jun; 140(6):715-9. PubMed ID: 6846630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The cautious advance on the right to treatment. Appelbaum PS Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Nov; 33(11):895-6. PubMed ID: 7141423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Supreme Court decisions on mental health: a review. Weiner BA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Jun; 33(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 7095767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to refuse treatment with antipsychotic medications: retrospect and prospect. Appelbaum PS Am J Psychiatry; 1988 Apr; 145(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 3279829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medicine court: Rogers in practice. Veliz J; James WS Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Jan; 144(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 3799842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to refuse psychiatric treatment: some legal and ethical considerations. Tancredi LR J Health Polit Policy Law; 1980; 5(3):514-22. PubMed ID: 7462583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decoding right to refuse treatment law. Perlin ML Int J Law Psychiatry; 1993; 16(1-2):151-77. PubMed ID: 8099069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The diverse goals involved in treatment of the mentally ill. Is a collision inevitable? Daly JL J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):49-89. PubMed ID: 3495624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. More positive supreme court views on psychiatry. Kennelly DJ Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 142(3):387-8. PubMed ID: 3970284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of the mentally ill: legal advocacy enters the second generation. Rubenstein LS Am J Psychiatry; 1986 Oct; 143(10):1264-9. PubMed ID: 3766789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The United States Supreme Court and mental health law. A retrospective. Perlin ML Med Law; 1985; 4(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 4038535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. More on the right to refuse treatment: Brother Fox and the mentally ill in New York. Rockford SH Law Med Health Care; 1983 Feb; 11(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 6550699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Involuntary commitment: the requirements of due process. Chapman TB Med Law; 1985; 4(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 4094527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Civil commitment: is the pendulum changing direction? Appelbaum PS Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Sep; 33(9):703-4. PubMed ID: 7129383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Autonomy, self determination, the right of involuntarily committed persons to refuse treatment, and the use of substituted judgment in medication decisions involving incompetent persons. Hermann DH Int J Law Psychiatry; 1990; 13(4):361-85. PubMed ID: 2286496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Consent and the mentally disordered detained patient. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 2003 Dec 11-2004 Jan 7; 12(22):1331-4. PubMed ID: 14688654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]