495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6826158)
1. Insanity defense continues to draw attention in Washington, state capitols.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1983 Jan; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 6826158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In defense of the insanity defense.
Beigel H
Hillside J Clin Psychiatry; 1983; 5(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 6662497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
Dolan B
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S12-8. PubMed ID: 16575810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Forensic psychiatric assessment in the USSR].
Friemert K
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov; 40(11):671-7. PubMed ID: 3237873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Competence to stand trial in Connecticut.
Herron DC; Zonana HV; Crane LE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 6640120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Forensic psychiatry: critique of a critique.
Zonana HV
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 6478066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethics and expert witnesses: the troubled role of psychiatrists in court.
Clements CD; Ciccone JR
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 6743845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas: an eight-state study.
Callahan LA; Steadman HJ; McGreevy MA; Robbins PC
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 1786413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Further comments on the insanity defense in the aftermath of the Hinckley trial.
Halpern AL
Psychiatr Q; 1984; 56(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 6522530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Georgia Court Competency Test: the base-rate problem.
Wildman RW; White PA; Brandenburg CE
Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):1055-8. PubMed ID: 2377402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Racial differences in the criminalization of the mentally ill.
Grekin PM; Jemelka R; Trupin EW
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 7841513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The insanity defense: a difficult necessity.
McGrath JJ
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 36(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 3967874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disposition of insanity acquittees in the United States Military.
Lande RG
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 2245245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A paradoxical outcome of a regional review board decision: a case report.
Cashman FE
Can J Psychiatry; 1988 Nov; 33(8):778. PubMed ID: 3203282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychiatrists and the insanity defense.
Rotenberg LA
Pa Med; 1983 Sep; 86(9):48-9. PubMed ID: 6685857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Forensic psychiatry, its place and its promise.
Bromberg W
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 8054668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
Dolan B
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14(2 Suppl):S12-8. PubMed ID: 23570119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Guilty but mentally ill--in search of a perspective.
Ermutlu IM
J Med Assoc Ga; 1983 May; 72(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 6864120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The ethical dilemmas of forensic psychiatry: a utilitarian approach.
Halleck SL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 6478070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mentally disordered offenders in Sweden.
Lidberg L; Belfrage H
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 1786418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]