271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6826205)
1. Immunogenic cells in the regional lymph nodes after painting with the contact sensitizers picryl chloride and oxazolone: evidence for the presence of IgM antibody on their surface.
Asherson GL; Colizzi V; Watkins MC
Immunology; 1983 Mar; 48(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 6826205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction of cell-mediated immunity in the mouse: circumstantial evidence for highly immunogenic antigen in the regional lymph nodes following skin painting with contact sensitizing agents.
Asherson GL; Mayhew B
Isr J Med Sci; 1976; 12(4-5):454-67. PubMed ID: 1084883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contact sensitivity and the DNA response in mice to high and low doses of oxazolone: low dose unresponsiveness following painting and feeding and its prevention by pretreatment with cyclophosphamide.
Asherson GL; Perera MA; Thomas WR
Immunology; 1979 Mar; 36(3):449-59. PubMed ID: 312260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. T suppressor cells and suppressor factor which act at the efferent stage of the contact sensitivity skin reaction: their production by mice injected with water-soluble, chemically reactive derivatives of oxazolone and picryl chloride.
Asherson GL; Zembala M
Immunology; 1980 Dec; 41(4):1005-13. PubMed ID: 6450725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic restriction in the induction of contact sensitivity by footpad cell transfer.
Colizzi V
Ric Clin Lab; 1981; 11(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 7268273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increased lymphokine activated killer (LAK) activity in the regional lymph nodes of mice following immunization with contact sensitizing agents.
Gao LQ; Asherson GL; Malkovsky M
Clin Exp Immunol; 1987 Oct; 70(1):217-21. PubMed ID: 3500814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Equivalence of conventional anti-picryl T suppressor factor in the contact sensitivity system and monoclonal anti-NP TsF3: their final non-specific effect via the T acceptor cell.
Asherson GL; Dorf ME; Colizzi V; Zembala M; James BM
Immunology; 1984 Nov; 53(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 6333385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antibody responses to contact sensitizing agents. Effect of sensitized cells.
Thomas WR; Watkins MC; Wood PJ; Asherson GL
Immunology; 1978 Mar; 34(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 305889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Control of the immune response. I. Depression of DNA synthesis by immune lymph node cells.
Asherson GL; Wood PJ; Mayhew B
Immunology; 1975 Dec; 29(6):1057-65. PubMed ID: 1193682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of contact sensitivity. Selective induction of delayed hypersensitivity by the injection of cells from draining lymph nodes into the footpads of normal recipients.
Thomas WR; Asherson GL; Perera MA
Immunology; 1978 Apr; 34(4):725-31. PubMed ID: 721137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact sensitivity in the germ-free mouse.
MacDonald TT; Carter PB
J Reticuloendothel Soc; 1978 Sep; 24(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 731633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulation of lymphocyte proliferation in contact sensitivity: homeostatic mechanisms and a possible explanation of antigenic competition.
Kimber I; Shepherd CJ; Mitchell JA; Turk JL; Baker D
Immunology; 1989 Apr; 66(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 2469644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Production of immunity and unresponsiveness in the mouse by feeding contact sensitizing agents and the role of suppressor cells in the peyer's patches, mesenteric lymph nodes and other lymphoid tissues.
Asherson GL; Zembala M; Perera MA; Mayhew B; Thomas WR
Cell Immunol; 1977 Sep; 33(1):145-55. PubMed ID: 302759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Delayed hypersensitivity in mast-cell-deficient mice.
Thomas WR; Schrader JW
J Immunol; 1983 Jun; 130(6):2565-7. PubMed ID: 6602168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contact sensitivity in the mouse. IX. The role of immunological and non-immunological inflammation in the movement of lymphocytes to immunized lymph nodes.
Asherson GL; Barnes RM
Immunology; 1973 May; 24(5):885-94. PubMed ID: 4715261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Requirements for antigenic competition in contact sensitivity.
Kimber I; Cumberbatch M; Bentley AN; Baker D
J Clin Lab Immunol; 1990 Jun; 32(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 1967041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence for suppressor cell activity associated with depression of contact sensitivity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected mice.
Campa M; Garzelli C; Ferrannini E; Falcone G
Clin Exp Immunol; 1976 Nov; 26(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 991463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of the induction phase of contact sensitivity by footpad transfer of regional lymph node cells. Macrophages and radioresistant T-lymphocytes induce immunity.
Asherson GL; Zembala M; Mayhew B
Immunology; 1977 Jan; 32(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 300354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The mechanism of immunological unresponsiveness to picryl chloride and the possible role of antibody mediated depression.
Asherson GL; Zembala M; Barnes RM
Clin Exp Immunol; 1971 Jul; 9(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 4934398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. B cells are not required for T cell priming in low zone tolerance to contact allergens and contact hypersensitivity.
Seidel-Guyenot W; Alt R; Perschon S; Knop J; Steinbrink K
Eur J Immunol; 2004 Nov; 34(11):3082-90. PubMed ID: 15376190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
