These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6826373)
1. Limits of linearity for diagnostic X-ray equipment. Zeck OF; Greene RF Health Phys; 1983 Jan; 44(1):78-9. PubMed ID: 6826373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. More on generator linearity of diagnostic X-ray equipment. Rummerfield PS Health Phys; 1983 Sep; 45(3):815-7. PubMed ID: 6885496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic x-ray equipment performance standard; request for comments and information--FDA. Advance notice of proposed rulemaking. Fed Regist; 1997 Dec; 62(238):65235-7. PubMed ID: 10176581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Technical controls with test objects for quality assurance of x-ray diagnostic equipment]. Hagemann G Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1985; 123():138-55. PubMed ID: 2860857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [On establishing maximum permissible limits of irradiation in x-ray and radioisotope studies]. Kiriushkin VI; Sarapul'tsev IA Med Radiol (Mosk); 1968 Mar; 13(3):67-8. PubMed ID: 5665365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Modern diagnostic x-ray procedures and their technical assumptions]. Klemm T Landarzt; 1967 Oct; 43(28):1370-5. PubMed ID: 5616526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Establishing a total quality assurance program in diagnostic radiology. Carlton R Radiol Technol; 1980; 52(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 6997921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective review of the performance standard for diagnostic x-ray equipment; availability of report--FDA. Notice; final rule-related. Fed Regist; 1985 Nov; 50(218):46646-7. PubMed ID: 10274029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Establishment of the conversion factors for determining organ doses and absorbed energy in patients during x-ray diagnostic studies]. Gosch D; Gursky S; Wimmler F Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1989; 30(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 2798825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Check lists for the acceptance of new x-ray equipment]. von Essen HJ; Stargardt A Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 3961146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Measurement and control of x-ray tube voltage in clinical radiologic practice--a contribution to quality control in x-ray diagnosis]. Klein J Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 3961140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Quality control in X-ray diagnostic equipment with automatic exposure using a newly-developed test phantom. I. Tube voltage and exposure time]. Hagemann G Rontgenblatter; 1980 Aug; 33(8):379-85. PubMed ID: 7403789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Technical premises for the standardization of x-ray studies]. Stavitskiĭ RV Med Tekh; 1985; (6):13-4. PubMed ID: 4094531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Current role of x-ray technology in medical introscopy]. Blinov NN; Mazurov AI Med Tekh; 1998; (6):3-5. PubMed ID: 9949978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Methods of evaluation of the quality of x-ray images]. Novikov VIa Med Tekh; 1975; (2):35-8. PubMed ID: 1226094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Problems of technologic re-equipment of X-ray diagnostic services in the Russian Federation]. Blinov NN Med Tekh; 1998; (6):41-4. PubMed ID: 9949991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in diagnostic x-ray equipment. Some impressions from an exhibition. Williams JA Radiography; 1967 Oct; 33(394):227-8. PubMed ID: 6064501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]