These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6826485)
1. In-vitro effects of vancomycin, rifampicin, and fusidic acid, alone and in combination, against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Foldes M; Munro R; Sorrell TC; Shanker S; Toohey M J Antimicrob Chemother; 1983 Jan; 11(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 6826485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novobiocin and rifampicin in combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an in-vitro comparison with vancomycin plus rifampicin. Walsh TJ; Auger F; Tatem BA; Hansen SL; Standiford HC J Antimicrob Chemother; 1986 Jan; 17(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 3633267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-vitro antibacterial activity of fusidic acid alone and in combination with other antibiotics against methicillin-sensitive and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Drugeon HB; Caillon J; Juvin ME J Antimicrob Chemother; 1994 Dec; 34(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 7730233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The in-vitro activity of some antimicrobial agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Moorhouse EC; Mulvihill TE; Jones L; Mooney D; Falkiner FR; Keane CT J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 Mar; 15(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 3158632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro bactericidal activities of linezolid in combination with vancomycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, fusidic acid, and rifampin against Staphylococcus aureus. Grohs P; Kitzis MD; Gutmann L Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2003 Jan; 47(1):418-20. PubMed ID: 12499229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: susceptibility to fosfomycin, cefamandole, N-formimidoyl-thienamycin, clindamycin, fusidic acid and vancomycin. Graninger W; Leitha T; Breyer S; Francesconi M; Lenz K; Georgopoulos A Drugs Exp Clin Res; 1985; 11(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3869801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to imipenem and other antimicrobial agents. Ishag AJ; Durgham SM; Shibl AM Chemioterapia; 1987 Aug; 6(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 3477333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In-vitro activity of ciprofloxacin combined with either fusidic acid or rifampicin against Staphylococcus aureus. Røder BL; Gutschik E J Antimicrob Chemother; 1989 Mar; 23(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 2732119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in ability of cell-wall antibiotics to suppress emergence of rifampicin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Eng RH; Smith SM; Buccini FJ; Cherubin CE J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 Feb; 15(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 3845078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Disparity between timed-kill and checkerboard methods for determination of in vitro bactericidal interactions of vancomycin plus rifampin versus methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Bayer AS; Morrison JO Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1984 Aug; 26(2):220-3. PubMed ID: 6567464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro activities of teichomycin, fusidic acid, flucloxacillin, fosfomycin, and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Guenthner SH; Wenzel RP Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1984 Aug; 26(2):268-9. PubMed ID: 6237606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mutation frequencies for resistance to fusidic acid and rifampicin in Staphylococcus aureus. O'Neill AJ; Cove JH; Chopra I J Antimicrob Chemother; 2001 May; 47(5):647-50. PubMed ID: 11328777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In-vitro synergy testing of triple antibiotic combinations against Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from patients with endocarditis. Yu VL; Zuravleff JJ; Bornholm J; Archer G J Antimicrob Chemother; 1984 Oct; 14(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 6501129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In-vitro effects of vancomycin and rifampicin, alone and in combination, against methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Varaldo PE; Debbia E; Schito GC J Antimicrob Chemother; 1984 Dec; 14 Suppl D():35-41. PubMed ID: 6569872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antistaphylococcal activity of teicoplanin in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Shibl AM; Ishag AH; Durgham SM APMIS Suppl; 1988; 3():68-70. PubMed ID: 2972301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro activity of linezolid alone and in combination with gentamicin, vancomycin or rifampicin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by time-kill curve methods. Jacqueline C; Caillon J; Le Mabecque V; Miegeville AF; Donnio PY; Bugnon D; Potel G J Antimicrob Chemother; 2003 Apr; 51(4):857-64. PubMed ID: 12654769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gentamicin- and methicillin-resistant, clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: comparative in vitro and in vivo efficacy of alternative antimicrobial drugs. Traub WH; Spohr M; Bauer D Chemotherapy; 1984; 30(2):102-12. PubMed ID: 6559664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro activity of daptomycin combinations with rifampicin, gentamicin, fosfomycin and fusidic acid against MRSA strains. Aktas G; Derbentli S J Glob Antimicrob Resist; 2017 Sep; 10():223-227. PubMed ID: 28735049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus with particular reference to Victorian strains. Harvey K; Pavillard R Med J Aust; 1982 May; 1(11):465-7. PubMed ID: 7048040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]