These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6826934)

  • 1. Valvular heart disease: a perspective.
    Rahimtoola SH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Jan; 1(1):199-215. PubMed ID: 6826934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The third generation Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: early results.
    Relland J; Perier P; Lecointe B
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Nov; 6(5):1149-54. PubMed ID: 4045039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
    Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Prescott RJ; Miller HC
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses.
    Bloomfield P; Kitchin AH; Wheatley DJ; Walbaum PR; Lutz W; Miller HC
    Circulation; 1986 Jun; 73(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 3516447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How should I treat a severely symptomatic, high-risk female patient with degenerated mitral (Carpentier-Edwards porcine) and aortic (Sorin Mitroflow) bioprostheses?
    Berti S; Cerillo AG; Murzi M; Mariani M; Marchi F; Schäfer U; Attia R; Bapat V; Himbert D; Brochet E; Depoix JP; Nataf P; Vahanian A
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Feb; 10(10):1250-2. PubMed ID: 25244311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early and 8 year results of aortic valve replacement: a clinical study of 232 patients.
    Meurs AA; Gründemann AM; Bezemer PD; Geldof WC; Zienkowicz BS; Ong ST; de Jong IH
    Eur Heart J; 1985 Oct; 6(10):870-81. PubMed ID: 3878285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term follow-up after aortic valve replacement with Edwards Prima Plus stentless bioprostheses in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Christ T; Grubitzsch H; Claus B; Konertz W
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 23158257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should valvular replacement be reserved for symptomatic valvular heart disease?
    Rapaport E
    Cardiovasc Clin; 1977; 8(1):269-77. PubMed ID: 849595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
    Oxenham H; Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Lee RJ; Cunningham J; Prescott RJ; Miller HC
    Heart; 2003 Jul; 89(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 12807838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve replacements].
    Mühlberger V; Schistek R; Hopferwieser T; Schwaiger A; Scharfetter H; Knapp E
    Z Kardiol; 1986 Jun; 75(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 3751218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemodynamic changes after valve replacement with Starr-Edwards prostheses.
    Bristow JD; Kremkau EL
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 May; 35(5):716-24. PubMed ID: 1124728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: assessment of a patient selection policy.
    Louagie Y; Noirhomme P; Aranguis E; Eucher P; Vanruyssevelt P; Buche M; Dion R; Jaumin P; Schoevaerdts JC; Chalant CH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Oct; 104(4):1013-24. PubMed ID: 1405658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley convexoconcave prosthesis.
    Marshall WG; Kouchoukos NT; Pollock SB; Bradley EL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1984 May; 37(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 6712344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The best of valvular heart disease in 2006].
    de Gevigney G;
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2007 Jan; 100 Spec No 1():19-28. PubMed ID: 17405561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thirty-year results of Starr-Edwards prostheses in the aortic and mitral position.
    Gödje OL; Fischlein T; Adelhard K; Nollert G; Klinner W; Reichart B
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1997 Mar; 63(3):613-9. PubMed ID: 9066373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The long-term results of aortic valve replacement.
    Cohn LH
    Chest; 1984 Mar; 85(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 6365476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current status of the Beall, Bjork-Shiley, Braunwald-Cutter, Lillehei-Kaster and Smeloff-Cutter cardiac valve prostheses.
    Brawley RK; Donahoo JS; Gott VL
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jun; 35(6):855-65. PubMed ID: 124127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves.
    Williams GA; Labovitz AJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 Aug; 56(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 4025173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aortic valve replacement in preteenage children.
    Smith JM; Cooley DA; Ott DA; Ferreira W; Reul GJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1980 Jun; 29(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 7387243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.