These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 682824)
1. If your patient is hopelessly ill, must you go to court? Vaccarino JM Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Jul; 6(7):50-1. PubMed ID: 682824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Saikewicz-ophobia: is it justified? Gibbs RF Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Jul; 6(7):4. PubMed ID: 682822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Current medicolegal issues. The citation. Conn Med; 1981 Jan; 45(1):45-6. PubMed ID: 7226792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Pulling the plug": are you ready to make the decision? Ginsburg WH Physicians Manage; 1985 Mar; 25(3):349-51, 354, 357-60 passim. PubMed ID: 10270469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Feenan D Ir Med J; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 8575900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Only the court is competent. Connery JR Hosp Prog; 1978 May; 59(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 649109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New York Court of Appeals reviews Eichner and companion termination of treatment case. Schwartz RL Health Law Vigil; 1981 Apr; 4(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 10250672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Viewing the "Draft guidelines for state court decision making in authorizing or withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment" from the perspective of related areas of law and economics: a critique. Gorby JD Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):477-510. PubMed ID: 1563939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sounding board. The New York Court of appeals rules on the rights of incompetent dying patients. The conclusion of the Brother Fox case. Paris JJ N Engl J Med; 1981 Jun; 304(23):1424-5. PubMed ID: 7231467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Washington Supreme Court decides case re: removal of life support systems. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jan; 8(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 10269741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The legal aspects of medical euthanasia. Meyers DW Bioscience; 1973 Aug; 23(8):467-70. PubMed ID: 11660863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Whose rite is it anyway?: the search for a constitutional permit to die. Berman MB Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 22(1):105-58. PubMed ID: 11656255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Euthanasia questions stir new debate. Med World News; 1973 Sep; 14():73-78+. PubMed ID: 11662931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical ethics and the hopelessly ill child. Waldman AM J Pediatr Surg; 1976 May; 88(5):890-2. PubMed ID: 11662999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New Jersey Supreme Court outlines standards for treatment withdrawal. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1985 Feb; 8(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 10269746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bouvia v. Superior Court. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 3638287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Euthanasia and the law. Campbell T Alta Law Rev; 1979; 17(2):188-209. PubMed ID: 11662771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Care of the dying: the doctor and euthanasia. Rizzo R; Yonder J Linacre Q; 1974 Nov; 41(4):253-68. PubMed ID: 11662104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]