These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6828696)

  • 1. Evaluation of cassette performance: physical factors affecting patient exposure and image contrast.
    Schmidt RA; Chan HP; Kodera Y; Doi K; Chen CT
    Radiology; 1983 Mar; 146(3):801-6. PubMed ID: 6828696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of carbon fibre material in radiographic cassettes: estimation of the dose and contrast advantages.
    Dance DR; Lester SA; Carlsson GA; Sandborg M; Persliden J
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Apr; 70(832):383-90. PubMed ID: 9166075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation exposure reduction using carbon fiber.
    Trefler M
    Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):751-4. PubMed ID: 7063697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation of the shielding characteristics of computed radiography cassettes.
    Potts R; Baker K; Bridge L
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 81(962):151-3. PubMed ID: 18238923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical characteristics of scattered radiation in diagnostic radiology: Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Chan HP; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 4000070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effects of high-strip density anti-scatter grid on image quality and radiation dose].
    Wamser G; Maier W; Aichinger H; Bohndorf K
    Rofo; 1997 Jun; 166(6):475-80. PubMed ID: 9272997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backscatter from metal surfaces in diagnostic radiology.
    Kodera Y; Schmidt RA; Chan HP; Doi K
    Radiology; 1984 Jan; 150(1):231-4. PubMed ID: 6689765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. X-ray scatter background signals in transmission radiography.
    Motz JW; Dick CE
    Med Phys; 1975; 2(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 1186632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scatter-reduction characteristics of an infinity-focused gridded radiographic cassette.
    Floyd CE; Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Sep; 29(9):852-5. PubMed ID: 7995706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of radiographic screens to scattered radiation and its relationship to image contrast.
    Castle JW
    Radiology; 1977 Mar; 122(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 841075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing the weight of the EC-L cassette.
    Munro P; Mulligan M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):290-9. PubMed ID: 12183003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. X-ray coherent scattering form factors of tissues, water and plastics using energy dispersion.
    King BW; Landheer KA; Johns PC
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4377-97. PubMed ID: 21709341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
    Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation of X-ray equipment factors influencing patient dose in radiography.
    Williams JR; Catling MK
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Nov; 71(851):1192-8. PubMed ID: 10434915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scatter in computed radiography.
    Tucker DM; Souto M; Barnes GT
    Radiology; 1993 Jul; 188(1):271-4. PubMed ID: 8511311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of transmission data of diagnostic X rays through concrete using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Noto K; Koshida K; Iida H; Fukuda A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Feb; 133(3):144-52. PubMed ID: 19307234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.