These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6828744)

  • 1. The use of high-speed film/screen combinations to improve diagnostic image quality.
    LePage JR; Trefler M
    Radiology; 1983 Apr; 147(1):265-7. PubMed ID: 6828744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoperative arteriography: comparison of conventional screen-film with photostimulable imaging plate radiographs.
    Pond GD; Seeley GW; Ovitt TW; Chernin MM; Yoshino MT; Roehrig H; McIntyre KE
    Radiology; 1989 Feb; 170(2):367-70. PubMed ID: 2911659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Wiener spectra of roentgen film-screen combinations].
    Mirandé W; Hoeschen D
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Mar; 38(3):81-4. PubMed ID: 3992138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations].
    Barth HH; Grasser H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conventional vs computed radiography: evaluation of myelography.
    Yang PJ; Seeley GW; Carmody RF; Seeger JF; Yoshino MT; Mockbee B
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1988; 9(1):165-8. PubMed ID: 3124568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A urological x-ray study table with a 36-cm x-ray image intensifier].
    Melchior H; Lang G
    Urologe A; 1983 Jan; 22(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 6220504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
    Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Choice of screens in high-speed angiography.
    Reichmann S; Astrand K; Lundin L
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1979; 20(6):977-83. PubMed ID: 546079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of the film/screen combination on tomographic image quality.
    Cohen G; Barnes JO; Peña PM
    Radiology; 1978 Nov; 129(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 704869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modification of an automatic exposure control system for mammography to accommodate multiple-speed, screen-film systems.
    Rossi RP; Williams C; Gill D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):685-6. PubMed ID: 3262269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Investigation of low-contrast signal detection in computed radiography (CR)].
    Higashida Y; Matsumoto M; Yoshioka S; Takahashi M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Nov; 49(11):1411-9. PubMed ID: 2602104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speeds of film-screen combinations for radiography.
    Holloway AF; Cheng CN; Paix D
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Dec; 34(4):331-4. PubMed ID: 6668304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Film-screen digital radiography.
    Schwenker RP; Eger H
    Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a new mammographic film: methods and considerations.
    Tsalafoutas OA; Kolovos CA; Tsapaki V; Betsou S; Koliakou E; Maniatis PN; Xenofos S
    Health Phys; 2008 Apr; 94(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 18332725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.